Search Results for "CESTAT appeal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "CESTAT appeal"

330 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 330 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Input Service Credit on Repair of Company Vehicles and Rent-a-Cab Services Allowed. The court held that repair of company vehicles and rent-a-cab services used for transportation of staff/guests are eligible input services under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

2 Dec 2015

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Mangalore, against the final order No.21966/2014 passed by the Customs, Exci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Pre-deposit Order in Service Tax Valuation Dispute — Free Electricity Not Consideration. The court held that electricity supplied free of cost by customers to the service provider is not consideration for taxable service under Section 67 of Finance Act, 1994, and thus not includible in value.

9 Jul 2012

The appellant, M/s Inox Air Products Limited, is engaged in setting up air separation plants at customers' premises, which are leased to customers and...

High Court

High Court of Madras Hears Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Duty Demand on Photographic Film Conversion — Tribunal's Order on Revenue Neutrality and Limitation Questioned. Revenue challenges CESTAT's order setting aside duty demand of Rs. 20,37,33,174 under Section 11A(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944 on grounds of revenue neutrality and time-bar.

23 Jul 2026

Background: The appeal arose from a central excise duty demand on a company engaged in converting jumbo rolls of photographic films and trading import...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal on Vested Right of Appeal in Central Excise Case — Amended Pre-deposit Requirement Not Applicable to Appeals Where Lis Arose Prior to Amendment. The court held that the right of appeal is a vested right and the amended Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, effective from 6 August 2014, cannot be applied retrospectively to fetter that right.

25 Jul 2016

The appellant, Nimbus Communications Limited, entered into an agreement and was subjected to a service tax demand. The appellant filed an appeal befor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Predeposit Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute. CESTAT's direction to deposit Rs. 1 crore set aside as assessee had strong prima facie case on valuation under Section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

21 Mar 2012

The appellant, Jabil Circuit India Private Limited, is a manufacturer of set-top boxes. It sold these boxes to Thomson Holdings India Private Limited ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Cenvat Credit Dispute — Cargo Sales Report Held Valid Document for Availing Credit. CESTAT's finding that Cenvat credit cannot be denied merely because the document does not contain all particulars under Rule 9(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, upheld.

21 Sep 2022

The present appeal was filed by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Mumbai (West) under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal Against CESTAT Predeposit Order for Non-Consideration of Binding Supreme Court Precedent on Jurisdiction of DRI Officer. Tribunal directed to reconsider waiver application in light of Commissioner of Customs vs. Sayed Ali (2011) 265 ELT 17 (SC) regarding Section 2(34) of Customs Act, 1962.

7 Sep 2011

The appellant, Tejus Proprietary Concern of Tejus Rohitkumar Kapadia, filed an appeal against two orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appell...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cenvat Credit on Capital Goods Allowed Even if Used for Exempted Goods Prior to Common Use. The court held that the restriction under Rule 3(4) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 does not apply when capital goods are used for both exempted and dutiable goods, and the assessee is entitled to credit if the goods are used in the manufacture of final products.

20 Jun 2018

The case involves appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Bengaluru, under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against orders of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Classification Dispute. CESTAT's finding that activity was classifiable under Works Contract Service rather than Erection Commissioning and Installation Service upheld.

14 Dec 2022

The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Thane, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Finance Act, 1994 agains...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Case — CESTAT's Finding of Baseless Charges Upheld. Penalty Dropped as Evidence Lacked Direct Link to Respondent Under Customs Act, 1962.

15 Dec 2022

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Customs under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the orders of the Customs, Excise and Service T...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)