Search Results for "Bombay General Clauses Act 1904"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Bombay General Clauses Act 1904"

67 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 67 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Rent Control Eviction Suit — Tenant's Deposit of Arrears Within 90 Days of Suit Summons Held Sufficient Under Section 15(3) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The court found that the trial court's finding that the application for deposit was filed on 10 October 2005 was perverse, as it was actually filed on 3 May 2005, and the deposit made on the next working day after a holiday was valid.

30 Aug 2024

The case involves a civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree dated 26 Fe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Applicability of MIR Act to Electricity Company. Held that the Maharashtra Industrial Relations Act, 1946 applies to the electricity industry under Entry 36 of Schedule I, and the petition was grossly delayed.

6 May 2022

The petitioner, Adani Electricity Mumbai Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the orders of reference dated 20th August 2019 passed by the Chief Co...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Respondent's Right to Compensation in Land Acquisition Dispute — Aforamento Grant Confers Absolute Title After Payment of Foro for 20 Years. The court held that the respondent, as heir of the aforamento grantee, is entitled to the entire compensation under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, rejecting the appellant Comunidade's claim based on revenue records.

26 Apr 2018

The case involves a land acquisition dispute where the Government acquired 12,800 sq.mtrs from survey no.89/2 of village Chorao for a Village Panchaya...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 28A(1) of Maharashtra Civil Courts Act, 1869 in Probate Reference. Section 28A(1) is not inconsistent with Indian Succession Act, 1925, and Civil Judges can be invested with probate jurisdiction.

5 Jun 2017

This judgment arises from a reference under Section 113 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, made by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Notification for Sub-Division Location in Public Interest Litigation — Violation of Statutory Consultation Requirements Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Court sets aside notification dated 26.07.2013 for non-compliance with Section 10 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, directing fresh consultation.

10 Dec 2014

The present public interest litigation was filed by residents of Sadak-Arjuni in Gondia district, challenging the notification dated 26.07.2013 issued...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Additional Collector's Order Setting Aside No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. The Court held that the seven-day period under Section 35(2) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958 excludes the date of receipt of the notice, validating the special meeting held on the seventh day.

5 Nov 2014

The case pertains to a no-confidence motion moved against the Sarpanch of Belgaon-Kelgaon Gram Panchayat. The petitioners, six out of nine members, su...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Village Panchayat Member for Being Servant of Agricultural Produce Market Committee. Agricultural Produce Market Committee Held to be a Local Authority Under Section 14(1)(i) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958, and Section 3(31) of General Clauses Act, 1897.

22 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Babasaheb Devram Sathe, was elected as a member of the Gram Panchayat, Jalgaon Budruk, in 2010 and also functioned as Sarpanch. The fi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Union's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Recognized Union Not Required for Item 6 Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act. Unrecognized Union Can Maintain Complaint Under Item 6 of Schedule IV of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

6 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Maharashtra Lok Kamgar Sanghatana, an unrecognized trade union registered under the Trade Union Act, 1926, filed a writ petition under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case, Reduces Enhanced Compensation. Court holds that mere potentiality of land for non-agricultural use does not justify compensation at rates comparable to developed plots without evidence of comparable sales.

10 Feb 2010

The case involves multiple first appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for a housing scheme under th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Change of Land Use from Park to Commercial in Public Interest Litigation. Notification under Section 37 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 set aside as land reserved for park cannot be diverted to commercial use without following proper procedure and public hearing.

19 Oct 2006

The petitioner, Sangharsh Kruti Samiti, a public interest organization, filed a writ petition challenging a notification dated 30.1.2003 issued by the...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)