Search Results for "Bombay Furlough and Parole Rules 1959"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Bombay Furlough and Parole Rules 1959"

80 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 80 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Convict's Furlough Extension in Calendar Year Computation Case — Prison Authorities' Interpretation of 'Calendar Year' Held Incorrect. The court held that furlough leave spilling over from one calendar year cannot be deducted from the next year's entitlement under Rule 4(C)(4) of the Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959.

13 Nov 2024

The petitioner, a life convict lodged at Yerawada Open Prison, Pune, filed a writ petition seeking extension of his furlough leave by 17 days. He had ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Initiates Suo Motu Contempt Against Prison Superintendent for Wilful Disobedience of Emergency Parole Orders. Superintendent Selectively Applied Binding Precedent Under Rule 19(1)(c) of Maharashtra Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) (Amendment) Rules, 2020, Refusing Release to 35 Eligible Prisoners While Granting Parole to 6 Ineligible Ones.

16 Mar 2022

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur initiated suo motu contempt proceedings against Shri Anupkumar M. Kumre, Superintendent of Central Prison, Nagpur, und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Aurangabad Bench Has Jurisdiction Over Parole Rejection Order Passed at Nashik Central Prison — Reference Answered in Favor of Respondent Prisoner. Territorial Jurisdiction Determined by Place of Confinement and Communication of Order, Not Solely by Location of Prison Authority.

25 Jan 2021

The case arose from a reference made by a division bench of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad regarding its territorial jurisdiction to entertain a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Refers Conflict on Emergency Parole for POCSO Convicts to Larger Bench. Interpretation of Rule 19(1)(C) of Maharashtra Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 Requires Resolution of Conflicting Decisions on Entitlement of Convicts Under Section 376 IPC and POCSO Act.

6 Nov 2020

The petitioner, Pintu Uttam Sonale, a convict under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 4, and 5 of the Protection of Children from S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Rule 19(2) of Bombay Parole and Furlough Rules, 1959 as Unconstitutional — Mandatory One-Year Gap Between Parole Releases Violates Article 14 and 21. Rule 19(2) held arbitrary and irrational for imposing blanket bar without considering individual circumstances.

14 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Kantilal Nandlal Jaiswal, a life convict undergoing sentence for murder under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC, along with other ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Prisoners' Furlough Petitions — Imposition of Condition to Stay Outside District Held Invalid Under Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959. Competent Authority Cannot Impose Condition Not Contemplated by Rules; Orders Rejecting Furlough Set Aside.

12 Feb 2019

The judgment concerns two criminal writ petitions filed by prisoners challenging orders rejecting their applications for furlough. The petitioners, Ra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Convict's Parole Extension Due to Wife's Medical Emergency. Prison authorities directed to consider humanitarian grounds for extension of parole under Maharashtra Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959.

13 Oct 2017

The petitioner, Hariom Vijay Pandey, a convict lodged in Nashik Road Central Prison, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court (Aura...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reduces Prison Punishment for Overstaying Furlough — Cutting of Remission Modified to One Day for Each Day of Overstay. Principle of Proportionality Applied to Prison Discipline Under Prisons Act, 1894 and Prisons (Bombay Furlough) Rules, 1959.

24 Jun 2016

The petitioner, Buwaji Sahadeo Hazare, a prisoner, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the prison punishment impos...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Inter-State Prisoners Challenging Local Surety Condition for Furlough. Condition in Government Circular dated 16th December 2008 requiring local surety within Maharashtra for prisoners from other States held violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

7 Sep 2010

The Bombay High Court dealt with two criminal writ petitions filed by prisoners Subodh Prasad and Jagbir Singh challenging the condition in Government...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough Leave Petitions Despite Past Overstay, Holding That Past Abscondence Cannot Be a Permanent Bar. The court ruled that each application must be considered on its own merits under the Prison (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959, and set aside the rejection orders for reconsideration.

25 Feb 2005

The judgment concerns two criminal writ petitions filed by convicts Ramchandra Raghu Naik and Bindu Ramchandra More, challenging the rejection of thei...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)