Search Results for "Bhaskaran case"

119 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 119 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Delayed Notice Beyond 30 Days Under Section 138 NI Act. Notice Posted on 31st Day from Bank Intimation Fails to Meet Mandatory Requirement of 'Giving Notice' Within 30 Days.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Shivnath Suryoba Gaonkar, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Complainant's Evidence Insufficient to Establish Debt Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Chikkachowdappa, against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Complaint in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Complaint Not Maintainable as Notice Was Not Sent to Correct Address.

The petitioner, P. Surendra Kumar, was shown as an accused in a private complaint filed by the respondent, M/s. Varkeys Retail Ventures Pvt. Ltd., all...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Chennai Dismisses Appeal by Former Directors Against Order to Cooperate with IRP and Hand Over Possession in CIRP under Section 10 IBC. Directors of Corporate Debtor are obligated to cooperate with IRP and hand over custody of premises and assets during CIRP.

The present appeal was filed by Mr. M. Bhaskaran and Mr. M. Radhakrishnan, who were the opposite parties in IA(IBC)/913(CHE)/2025 before the National ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Passes Judgment in Appeal Against Acquittal Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Whether a Cheque Issued as Security Attracts Liability Under Section 138 Remains the Central Question.

The appeal before the High Court of Bombay at Goa arose from a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The appellant, Goa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Mumbai Quashes Process in Dishonour of Cheque Cases for Non-Compliance with Section 202 Cr.P.C. — Accused Residing Outside Magistrate's Jurisdiction Requires Mandatory Enquiry Before Issuance of Process.

The petitioners, ASR Systems Private Ltd. and its Managing Director Rohit Wadhwa, were original accused in two complaints filed by Kimberly Clark Hygi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Termination by District Central Cooperative Bank, Holding It Not a State Under Article 12. Cooperative Bank Employee's Challenge to Dismissal Fails as DCC Bank Is Not an Instrumentality of the State and No Violation of Natural Justice Established.

The petitioner, Kiran Rangnath Kale, was employed as a Manager at the Beed District Central Cooperative Bank (respondent No. 3). He was initially appo...