Search Results for "Award Time Limit"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Award Time Limit"

870 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 870 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Petition for Extension of Bank Guarantee Pending Challenge to Arbitral Award — Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Post-award interim protection can be granted under Section 9 to preserve the subject matter of arbitration pending challenge to award.

15 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC), filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seekin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by State Undertaking in BOT Arbitration Dispute, Upholds Arbitral Award on Termination Payment. Court Reiterates Limited Scope of Judicial Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Emphasizing Finality of Arbitral Awards.

29 May 2026

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation Ltd. (MPRDC) against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh Hi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Landowners' Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case for Re-determination Under Section 28-A. The Court held that Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, being a beneficial provision, permits re-determination of compensation based on appellate court awards to ensure equality among similarly placed landowners, overriding a strict interpretation of the definition of 'Court' under Section 3(d).

25 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings for the Hubballi-Ankola Broad Gauge Line, where the appellants, landowners, lost their land and we...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Time Limits for Awards Under Land Acquisition Laws in Appeal Against High Court Ruling on Lapse of Proceedings. The Court Examines Whether the Two-Year Period Under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Applies Post-Repeal or the Twelve-Month Period Under Section 25 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Governs Awards Under Section 24(1)(a).

10 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for the Gosikhurd Project. On 16th June 2011, a notification...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Commercial Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act — Injunction Granted Without Considering Balance of Convenience and Irreparable Injury Set Aside. The court held that an interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC requires satisfaction of all three principles: prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury.

22 Mar 2021

The appellants, owners of a property, entered into a development agreement with the respondent developer. Disputes arose, and the respondent filed an ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Enforces Foreign Award in Two-Tier Arbitration — Holds ICC Award Enforceable Despite Prior Indian Award. Two-Tier Arbitration Clause Valid Under Indian Law; Natural Justice Opportunity Afforded to Respondent.

2 Jun 2020

The dispute arose from a contract between Centrotrade Minerals and Metals Inc., a US corporation, and Hindustan Copper Ltd. (HCL) for the sale of copp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case Due to Non-Communication of Award Under Section 12(2) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Proceedings Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as Award Not Communicated Before New Act Came Into Force.

4 Aug 2016

The petitioners, Jitesh Bhaiyalal Sahu and Rashmi Jitesh Sahu, owned 1.95 hectares of land in Mouza Morangana, Amravati. The State initiated acquisiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Award Extending Benefits to Transferred Workmen — Protection of Service Conditions Upheld Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court held that workmen transferred from erstwhile Tomco and Lakme factories were entitled to extension of benefits under prior awards and settlements, and the Industrial Court's award was within the scope of the reference.

16 Jul 2014

The petitioner, Hindustan Unilever Ltd. Research Centre And FCU / Development Centre, challenged an award of the Industrial Court dated 30 November 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Dismissing Complaint for Non-Implementation of Award. Delay of 4½ years in filing complaint under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 held fatal as no sufficient cause shown.

11 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Kashinath Parvati Labade, was a workman employed with the Department of Social Forestry, Maharashtra. He was allegedly illegally termi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Being Beyond Stipulated Time — Arbitration Clause Mandates Award Within Four Months of Entering Reference, Failure Renders Award Void.

2 May 2012

The appeal arose from an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside an arbitral award dated 17th August 2006 on the ground...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)