Search Results for "Article 70(1)"

215 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 215 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Provisional Attachment Order in GST Case for Non-Compliance with Section 83(1) MGST Act — Attachment Without Pending Proceeding or Prior Notice Invalid

The petitioner, Praful Nanji Satra, a businessman who rented out commercial premises and paid GST on license fees, challenged a provisional attachment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Seeking Enforcement of RBI COVID-19 Moratorium Package. Petitioner Challenges Banks' Denial of Moratorium Under RBI Circular Dated 27.03.2020.

Velankani Information Systems Limited, a company operating an IT park and a five-star hotel in Bengaluru, availed term loans aggregating Rs. 475 crore...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Tender Conditions for Sweeping Contract in Nashik Municipal Corporation — Net Worth and Experience Requirements Upheld. Court holds that Clause 3.2.2 and 3.4.2 of RFQ are not arbitrary or discriminatory and are justified for a long-term public hygiene contract.

The petitioner, M/s. Watergrace Products, a proprietorship firm engaged in solid waste management, challenged certain conditions in a Request for Qual...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 10475 OF 2011

The case involved a partnership firm (Petitioner) engaged in manufacturing soft gelatin pharmaceutical products, and a US corporation (Respondent No.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010366622012_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Pronounces Judgment in Criminal Appeal Against MPID Court's Order Rejecting Application to Declare Attachment Void. Appeal Raises Questions on Compliance with Sections 4 and 5 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interests of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999.

The criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from an order of the designated court under the Maharashtra Protection of Interests of Deposito...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Housing Loan Disbursement — No Privity of Contract Between Complainant and Bank. Complainant Not a 'Consumer' Under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as No Service Was Hired or Availed from the Appellant Bank.

The present appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by the respondent (original complainant) against the appellant bank before the National Cons...