Search Results for "Article 31B"

25 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 25 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Three Accused in Dacoity with Murder Case — Life Imprisonment Confirmed for Dacoity Under Section 396 IPC. Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recovery of Stolen Property Under Section 412 IPC.

The case involves four criminal appeals filed under Section 374 of the Criminal Procedure Code against a common judgment and order of conviction and s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Dispute Involving Will and Gift Deed Validity. Court upholds trial court's finding that the gift deed was not vitiated by undue influence and that the will was validly executed.

The case involves two appeals filed by Nina Agarwalla against Ashok Gupta and others. The dispute pertains to the validity of a gift deed and a will e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Land Dispute Case — Concurrent Findings Set Aside Due to Non-Application of Mind by First Appellate Court. The Court Held That the First Appellate Court Must Comply with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC and Decide the Appeal on Merits After Proper Appreciation of Evidence.

The present second appeals arise from a land dispute between the appellants (original plaintiffs) and the respondents (original defendants) concerning...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Involving Tribal Land Transfer. Decree for specific performance of agreement to sell tribal land to non-tribal can be granted subject to obtaining permission under Section 36A of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.

The appellant, Babasaheb Dhondiba Kute, a non-tribal, entered into an agreement dated 31.07.2001 with the respondent, Radhu Vithoba Barde, a tribal, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Applicability of Biological Diversity Rules to Indian Entities. Rule 17 of Biological Diversity Rules, 2004 and Benefit Sharing Regulations Apply to All Entities, Not Just Foreign Entities.

The petitioners, comprising an association of Ayurvedic drug manufacturers and individual companies, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against Confiscation Orders Under Central Excise Act and SARFAESI Act. Commissioner's Use of Omitted Rule 173Q(2) Invalid and SARFAESI Act Grants Priority to Secured Creditors Over Excise Dues.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by Punjab National Bank. The bank had extended credit fa...