Search Results for "Article 316"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Article 316"

322 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 322 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Appeal Against Single Judge's Dismissal of Petition on Extension of Tenure of Raichur Municipal Councillors. Appeal Focuses on Interpretation of Section 503 of Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act and Exclusion of Administrator Period from Five-Year Term.

28 Apr 2026

The writ appeal arose from the dismissal of W.P.No.202910/2025 by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka, which had been filed by 23 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail in MPID Act Case Due to Non-Filing of Charge-Sheet Within 60 Days. Mere 'Seen' Remark on Application Under Section 316(5) BNS Does Not Constitute Valid Extension of Remand Under Section 187(3) BNSS.

7 Oct 2025

The petitioners, Ranganth Tulshiram Galande and Anil Zumbarrao Darekar, were arrested on 07.07.2025 in connection with Crime No. 673 of 2025 registere...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Strikes Down Caste-Based Discrimination in Prison Manuals as Unconstitutional. Prison Rules Dividing Labour and Segregating Barracks by Caste Violate Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23 of the Constitution.

1 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Sukanya Shantha, a journalist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the repeal of offendi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses/Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Minimum Wages Notification – Not mentioned. Petitioners, including industry associations and companies, challenged notification dated 27.12.2016 issued by the Labour Department on grounds of unconstitutionality and violation of Minimum Wages Act, 1948.

29 Mar 2019

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was brother of deceased and his evidence was inconsistent and not corroborated.

18 Sep 2017

The case pertains to the murder of Ashok Salve, who was the elder brother of PW-7 Bajirao Salve. The appellants, Santosh Ashok Chavan (accused No.1) a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification. Petitioners Alleged Notification Ultra Vires Article 246 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Seeking to Quash Demand Notices.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, corporations, and individuals, including National ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

3 Dec 2015

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)