Search Results for "Article 265 Constitution"

164 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 164 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Service Tax Demand on Payment Aggregator Services for FY 2015-16. Services Provided by FIS Payment Solutions to Acquiring Banks for Settlement of Card Transactions Held Not Taxable as 'Business Auxiliary Service' Under Finance Act, 1994.

The petitioner, FIS Payment Solutions and Services India Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, provides payment aggre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Assessment Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice and Assessment Order Found to be Based on Different Grounds, Causing Prejudice to Assessee.

The Petitioner, West India Continental Oils Fats Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 2013, filed a writ petition under Article 22...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of TDS Refund Under Section 264 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Assessee Failed to Establish That Payments to Foreign Collaborator Were Not Royalty Under Section 9(1)(vi) Read with DTAA.

The petitioners, M/s BASF (India) Limited and Mr. P.A. Ramasamy, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 28th February 2001 passed by the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Land Dispute — No Interference Under Article 227 as Findings of Fact Are Not Perverse. The court held that concurrent findings of fact based on evidence cannot be interfered with under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the petitioners (heirs of the original plaintiff) challenging the concurrent findings of the lower courts i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

A comprehensive overview of the legal proceedings and judgments surrounding the review petition in Civil Appeal, shedding light on key arguments, legal interpretations, and the subsequent decision by the court.

Review petition seeking the review of an order passed in a civil appeal. In the original order, the Civil Appeal was allowed, setting aside the judgme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Held that the Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Suit for Non-Prosecution Without Considering Merits and That the Suit Was Not Abated Despite Death of Sole Proprietor as Legal Representatives Were Brought on Record.

The present appeal arises from a suit filed in 1983 by the original plaintiffs (respondents herein) against the original defendant, Bitesh Hanumantrao...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of ESI Contributions Paid Under Mistake of Law — Employer Entitled to Restitution Under Section 72 of Indian Contract Act. Mistake of Law Does Not Bar Claim for Refund Under Section 75 of ESI Act, 1948.

The petitioners, M/s. Indian Hotels Co. Limited (owner of Taj Mahal Hotel and Taj Intercontinental) and its shareholder, filed a writ petition seeking...