Search Results for "Appellate Side Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Appellate Side Rules"

2496 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2496 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Ex-parte Decree Set Aside Due to Improper Service of Summons. First Appellate Court's Order Restored as Trial Court Failed to Comply with Order V Rule 17 CPC.

14 Jan 2022

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of contract (O.S.No.126/2007) alleging that the respondent/defendant executed an agreeme...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and concurrent.

16 Apr 2015

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree dated 12.4.2005 passed by the First Additional ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals Under Section 58 of RERA Act Against Orders of Adjudicating Officer and Goa RERA. Maintainability of Second Appeal Under RERA Act Questioned - Held That Section 58 of RERA Act Does Not Provide for a Second Appeal to the High Court Against Orders of the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal.

12 Jan 2023

The appellant, Adam A. Jumma, proprietor of Aman Builders and Developers, Goa, filed two second appeals under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulatio...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Full Bench Hears Writ Appeals Filed by Registrar General Against Multiple Judicial Officers. The appeals, all service-related, involve a dispute concerning the seniority or conditions of service of judicial officers across various positions.

1 Apr 2026

...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal in Civil Suit Remand Case — Remand Order Set Aside as Appellate Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Order 41 Rule 23A CPC. The appellate court cannot remand a suit for retrial when the trial court has already decided it on merits without any procedural irregularity.

29 Aug 2023

The appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 22 March 2022 passed by the District Judge, Raigad, setting aside the judgment and decree dated 22 A...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka heard regular second appeals challenging concurrent lower court findings in a civil suit for declaration and injunction. The appeals were filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the judgments of the Senior Civil Judge, Channapatna.

16 Dec 2024

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Property Dispute Over Injunction Orders — Held That First Appellate Court Erred in Granting Injunction Without Considering Balance of Convenience and Prima Facie Case Under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

4 Mar 2014

The case involves two appeals filed by the appellants against the judgment and order of the First Appellate Court in Regular Civil Appeal Nos. 615/201...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Encroachment Suit — Remand Order Set Aside for Exceeding Appellate Powers Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC. The First Appellate Court's order reversing trial court's dismissal and remanding for fresh trial was held to be without jurisdiction as the suit was not disposed of on a preliminary point.

20 Dec 2019

The case arises from a suit for removal of encroachment and possession filed by the respondent (original plaintiff) against the appellant (original de...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Title and Possession. Family Arrangement and Adverse Possession Claims Fail as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Possession and Necessary Parties Were Not Impleaded.

2 Jan 2025

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by the defendant Selvaraj against the concurrent judgments of the Trial Court and First Appellate Court which ...

High Court

The High Court of Karnataka Division Bench heard writ appeals against the order of the learned Single Judge in a service matter involving judicial officers. The appeals were filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging the order dated 27-09-2013 in WP Nos. 41684-691/2012.

3 Apr 2014

These writ appeals, filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, arise from a common order dated 27-09-2013 passed by a learned Single...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)