WRIT PETITION NO. 17 OF 2004
9 Aug 2010The judgment pertains to four writ petitions filed by international airlines—Malaysian Airlines, Saudi Arabian Airlines, North West Airlines, and Ke...
Search Results for "Airlines"
224 result(s) found
Found 224 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeals in Service Tax on Airport Development Fee Case. User Development Fee Collected by Airport Operators Under Statutory Authority is Not Subject to Service Tax Under Finance Act, 1994.
19 May 2023The Supreme Court considered appeals by the revenue against CESTAT orders that had held user development fee collected by airport operators not liable...
- 177
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging State Labour Court Jurisdiction in Salary Recovery Dispute. Non-scheduled air transport service not covered by Central Government's definition under Section 2(a)(i) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, hence State Labour Court has jurisdiction.
11 Jul 2006The petitioner, MESCO Airlines Limited, an air transport company holding a license for non-scheduled air transport service under the Aircraft Rules, 1...
- 107
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Airport Authority in Tender Dispute, Reinstating Eligibility Criteria for Ground Handling Services. The Court Held That Tender Conditions Fall Within Commercial Wisdom of Authority and Are Not Arbitrary, and an NGO Lacks Locus Standi to Challenge Them Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
30 Sep 2022The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by the Centre for Aviation Policy, Safety & Research (CAPSR) challenging the eligibility criteria in Requ...
- 402
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Employees Against Air India for Failure to Accept Resignations. Employer Cannot Refuse Resignation or Force Employee to Continue Service Under Air India Certified Standing Orders.
17 Apr 2014The petitioners were employees of Air India Limited (respondent no.2) whose services were transferred to Air India Engineering Services Limited (respo...
- 61
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Maintainability of Unfair Labour Practice Complaint Against Airline Services Provider. Services like aircraft cleaning and baggage handling are not 'air transport services' and the Central Government is not the appropriate government under Section 2(a)(i) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
29 Nov 2016The Petitioner, M/s. Livewel Aviation Services Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in providing various services to airline companies within airport precincts, incl...
- 177
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against High Court Ruling That Canteen Workers of Subsidiary Are Not Employees of Air India — Corporate Veil Not Lifted in Absence of Fraud. Workmen of Statutory Canteen Run by Wholly-Owned Subsidiary Under Factories Act Not Deemed Employees of Holding Company When No Direct Control or Sham Arrangement Proven.
1 Aug 2026Background: The litigation arose from an industrial dispute raised by workmen employed by Chef Air, a unit of Hotel Corporation of India (HCI), who op...
- 63
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Winding Up Petition Against Airline Company for Inability to Pay Debts. Creditor's Statutory Demand for USD 3 Million Remained Unpaid, Leading to Order for Winding Up Under Sections 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956.
18 Nov 2016The petitioner, Aerotron Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) r...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Air India's Standing Order 17 Which Permits Termination Without Assigning Reasons. The Court Considered Whether Such Unguided Power Violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.
25 Feb 2019The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by employees of Air India Limited (formerly NACIL) whose services were terminated under Standing Ord...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition to Refer Industrial Dispute to Arbitration — Industrial Disputes Under I.D. Act Are Not Arbitrable. The court held that disputes under Section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for recovery of wages cannot be referred to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
20 Nov 2012The petitioner, Kingfisher Airlines Limited, a public limited company in the air transport industry, filed three writ petitions challenging the reject...
- 195
