Search Results for "Advertising Hoardings"

33 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 33 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.4761 OF 2024

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ for Refund of Excess Hoarding Fees Due to Disputed Facts. Claim for Refund Under Contracts Not Maintainable in Writ Jurisdiction, Must Be Adjudicated by Civil Court.

The matter involved a writ petition filed by M/s. Diamond Publicities, a proprietorship concern, seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the Greater Chen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Excess Hoarding Fees as Disputed Facts Not Triable Under Article 226. Petitioner Granted Liberty to Approach Civil Court as Entitlement to Refund Requires Adjudication of Unverified License Conditions and Agreements.

The petitioner, a proprietary concern engaged in advertising, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Disposes Writ Petition as Infructuous After Petitioner Endorses Cause No Longer Exists. Court Directs Authorities to Verify and Remove Unauthorized Hoardings, if Any, on Petitioner's Property.

The petitioner, D.M.C. Joseph, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Madras seeking directions to the District Collector and the Commissioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Municipal Advertisement Tax Under Section 134, KMC Act, 1976. Holds That GST Does Not Bar Levy as Advertisement Tax Is a Fee for License, Distinct From Tax on Services.

A registered association of advertising agencies and its members, engaged in the business of advertisement on hoardings licensed by the Hubballi Dharw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010159832015_1

...