Search Results for "Adverse entries"

844 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 844 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Promotion Challenge in Port Trust Service Matter — Adverse Remarks Must Be Communicated Before Being Considered for Promotion. Uncommunicated adverse remarks cannot be used to deny promotion to Assistant Traffic Manager under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Manuel Lourenco D'Costa, was an employee of the Board of Trustees of the Port of Mormugao (respondent No.1). He was appointed as a Cle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka adjudicates criminal appeals arising from conviction of a bank employee and relative for conspiracy, forgery, and corruption. Convictions under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 were challenged before the High Court.

The appeals arose out of the judgment dated 26.12.2009 passed by the Special Judge for CBI Cases, Bangalore in Spl.C.C.No.29/2004, whereby the appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Two Regular First Appeals Under Section 96 CPC Against Common Judgment in Suits for Declaration, Injunction, Partition, and Dissolution of Partnership — Property Dispute Involving Sites in Mysore and Bangalore

The Regular First Appeals RFA No.37/2003 and RFA No.84/2003 were filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the common j...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Will and Adverse Possession. The court held that the document dated 24.10.1960 was a Will and not a settlement deed, and that the appellant failed to prove adverse possession.

The case involves a Regular Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment and decree dated 30....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer for Inadequate Disposal Record. Rule 10(4)(a)(i) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 applied to compulsorily retire an Additional District Judge based on consistently inadequate disposal and adverse remarks.

The petitioner, Govind Laxmanrao Edke, was a judicial officer who entered service as a Civil Judge, Junior Division in June 1980, was promoted to Civi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Judicial Officer Challenging Compulsory Retirement. Non-Communication of Adverse Remarks in ACRs Violates Natural Justice, Order Set Aside.

The petitioner, Smt. Shraddha Vinod Deo, was appointed as a Judicial Magistrate First Class on 1st September 1990 and served at various places includi...