Search Results for "Additional Tahsildar office"

860 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 860 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Remand Order in Right of Way Dispute Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Court upholds Additional Collector's order remitting matter for fresh enquiry as Tahsildar's order was passed without proper notice and opportunity of hearing.

The petitioners, Nago Hari Zangte and others, filed a writ petition challenging the orders of the Additional Collector and Additional Commissioner whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Tribunal Order Directing Displaced Officer to Resume Post Without Hearing Petitioner. Transfer Order Upheld as Petitioner Had Already Taken Charge, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The Petitioner, Shri Rajendra s/o Maruti Najan, was posted as Tahsildar (Revenue) in Collector Office, Nashik since 23 April 2020. By order dated 12 A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition Challenging Interdepartmental Communication for Encroachment Removal, Grants Liberty to Approach District Collector. Petitioner directed to seek remedy before District Collector if action contrary to earlier order under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act.

The petitioner, Erumapalayam Kongu Nagar Samuga represented by its President S. Perumal @ Raja, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tahsildar's Endorsement Rejecting Mutation Entry for Land Granted Under Section 94 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. Revenue Authorities Cannot Adjudicate Title or Validity of Grant in Mutation Proceedings; Mutation Entries Are Only for Fiscal Purposes.

The petitioners, five individuals, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Disposes of Mandamus Petition Seeking Land Survey; Holds Pending Civil Suit Pertaining to Different Survey Number Not a Ground to Refuse Survey

The dispute arose from a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by Mohamed Yusuf, who sought a writ of mandamus directing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Grampanchayat Dispute. Special Meeting Convened by Tahsildar Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Held Valid Despite Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

The petitioner, Surekha Eshwar Jadhav, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Bhatapur (PD), Taluka Mukhed, District Nanded. Respondent nos.1 to 6, who wer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decision on Auction Sale: Statutory Violations Render Sale Null and Void. Despite recognizing significant procedural breaches, the Supreme Court offers the appellant a chance to retain the industrial property by settling liabilities.

The legality of an auction sale conducted by the Tahsildar and confirmed by the Additional Collector, which was later contested on the grounds of stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar and Surveyor to Consider Representation for Survey and Demarcation of Land Held Under Joint Patta. Court Orders Consideration of Application for Separate Patta Within Eight Weeks Following Precedent in W.P(MD)No.12676 of 2024.

The petitioner, V. Ramachandran, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Cour...