Search Results for "Acquittal retrospective"

40 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 40 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Validity of Prosecution Sanctions: Pre-Trial Determination or Trial Issue? A comprehensive analysis of conflicting Apex Court judgments on the timing and significance of challenging prosecution sanctions under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The legal debate on whether the validity of a prosecution sanction must be determined before trial or can be contested during the trial. It examines k...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).

The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Union of India's Writ Petition Challenging CAT Order to Pay Full Salary During Suspension Period — Suspension Allowance Already Paid, No Entitlement to Full Salary Without Work.

The petitioners, Union of India and the General Manager, Ordnance Factory, Varangaon, challenged the judgment and order dated 09.03.2005 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Victim's Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case. Holds that the amendment to Section 372 CrPC giving right to victim to appeal is procedural and retrospective.

The applicant, Babu Uligappa Batteli, was the original complainant who filed a complaint against respondent no.2 for offences under the Prevention of ...