Search Results for "120 Days Limitation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "120 Days Limitation"

538 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 538 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act for Delay in Filing Section 34 Application — Limitation Period for Challenging Arbitral Award Cannot Be Extended Beyond Statutory Cap. The court held that the appellant's application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was barred by limitation as it was filed over four years after the award, far beyond the three-month period plus thirty-day extension allowed under Section 34(3).

19 Feb 2026

The appellant, Darshana Bhupendra Parekh, filed a First Appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the dismissal of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Condoning Delay in Arbitration Challenge. Limitation Period Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Held Absolute and Not Extendable Beyond 30 Days.

16 Dec 2021

The appellant, Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd., had provided a loan to the respondent, Maheshbhai Tinabhai Rathod, for purchase of tract...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Condonation of Delay in Land Acquisition Appeal Filed Beyond 120 Days Under 2013 Act. Issue of Whether Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Section 74(1) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 Remains to be Decided.

25 Sep 2019

The Deputy Commissioner and Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bengaluru (SLAO) filed an appeal under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 34 Petition as Time-Barred, Confirms Arbitral Award. Limitation for Filing Section 34 Petition Runs from Date of Receipt of Award, Not from Date of Filing of Wrong Remedy.

4 May 2016

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bomb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Dismissal of Execution Application for Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds. Execution of Arbitral Award is Governed by Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963, Not Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

25 Sep 2014

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd., had granted a loan of Rs.3,95,000 to respondent No.1 for purchasing a tractor, with respo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses High Court's Quashing of FIR in Cross-Case Involving Assault and Wrongful Restraint - Limitation Period for Cognizance Commences from Date of Offence, Not Charge-Sheet Filing, Under Sections 468 and 469 CrPC, with Delay Condonable Under Section 473. Court Emphasizes That Negligence of Investigating Officer Should Not Benefit Accused, Especially in Cases of Cross-FIRs Arising from Same Incident.

9 Apr 2026

The dispute arose from cross-FIRs filed after an incident on 09.05.2011 involving the appellant-complainant and respondent-accused, an advocate. The a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against EPF Appellate Tribunal's Rejection of Appeal on Limitation Grounds. The court held that the Tribunal must consider the explanation for delay and condone it if sufficient cause is shown, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication.

11 Dec 2006

The petitioner, Yeshwant Sahakari Kamgar Bank Ltd. (now known as Brahmadev Dada Mane Sahakari Bank Limited, Solapur), filed a writ petition challengin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Delay Condonation Application in Company Appeal — Limitation Period Under Section 10F of Companies Act, 1956 Runs from Date of Knowledge of Order, Not from Receipt of Certified Copy. The court held that the right to receive a certified copy under Regulation 29(4) of CLB Regulations does not postpone the commencement of limitation, and the appeal filed beyond 120 days from the date of knowledge is barred.

11 Mar 2014

This judgment concerns a company application filed by Jagdish Lal Gupta, the appellant in an appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, seek...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners in Land Consolidation Dispute, Holding That Modification Application Under Section 31A of Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 Must Be Filed Within Reasonable Time and Only Before Settlement Commissioner. Deputy Director of Land Records Lacks Authority to Modify Scheme After 40 Years.

2 Feb 2018

The petitioners, ten individuals, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Deputy Director of Land Records, Nasik Division, which allowed an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suits as Time-Barred Under Limitation Act. Claims for Loss of Vessel and Cargo Filed Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period from Date of Vessel's Sinking.

17 Sep 2018

The judgment concerns two admiralty suits filed in the Bombay High Court. Admiralty Suit No.3 of 2011 was filed by the time charterer of the vessel 'N...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)