Search Results for "distinction between public order and law and order"

3374 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3374 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Attempt to Murder Case Stemming from Land Dispute. Knife Blow on Victim's Head Near Ear Held Sufficient to Establish Intention to Kill Under Section 307 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The case arose from a prolonged land dispute between neighbours in a village. The complainant and his brother had purchased a plot of land adjacent to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Guilt. Conviction under Sections 448, 323, 341, 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Chain of Circumstances.

The appellant, Veda @ Vedaprasad, was convicted by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hassan, in S.C.No.228/2014 for offences punishable u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Cognizability of Section 63 of Copyright Act in Writ Petition by Cab Aggregator; Issue Involves Classification of Offence Punishable with Imprisonment up to Three Years.

Background: The dispute arose from a complaint filed by Lahari Recording Company (respondent no. 2), a music company, against ANI Technologies Pvt. Lt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under POCSO Act and IPC for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault and Kidnapping. Trial Court Had Imposed 20 Years Rigorous Imprisonment for Offences Against a Minor.

The appellant, original accused no.1, was convicted in Special (POCSO) Case No.94/2017 by the Extra Joint District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 43B(f) of Income Tax Act — Leave Encashment Deduction Allowed Only on Actual Payment. Clause (f) is not arbitrary or violative of Article 14 as it serves a legitimate purpose of preventing abuse and ensuring employee welfare.

The Supreme Court in this appeal considered the constitutional validity of clause (f) of Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which was inserted b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Housing Loan Disbursement — No Privity of Contract Between Complainant and Bank. Complainant Not a 'Consumer' Under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as No Service Was Hired or Availed from the Appellant Bank.

The present appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by the respondent (original complainant) against the appellant bank before the National Cons...