Search Results for "vehicle control"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "vehicle control"

1200 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1200 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Negligence Not Required for Structured Compensation. Court holds that for claims under Section 163-A, the claimant need not prove negligence; the 'arising out of use' requirement is satisfied if the vehicle was involved in the accident, even if the collision was not the direct cause of death.

27 Jun 2017

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the parents and sister of Dinesh Kadam, a 22-year-old lift mechanic who died on 11 April 2007 aft...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Hotel Liability for Theft of Guest's Car from Valet Parking Under Bailment and Infra Hospitium Principles. Insurer as Subrogee Can Maintain Consumer Complaint as Co-Complainant.

14 Nov 2019

The appeal arose from a consumer complaint filed by the insurer (United India Insurance Company Ltd.) and the car owner (Respondent No. 2) against the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Insurance Company Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Lack of Income Proof. Claimant's 100% Permanent Disability Acknowledged but Multiplier and Income Assessment Modified Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

16 Feb 2010

The National Insurance Company Ltd. appealed against the judgment and order dated 7.6.2004 of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Pune, in Claim Peti...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Parents Fail to Prove Negligence and Income of Deceased Son. Claim for Compensation Dismissed as Claimants Did Not Establish Rash and Negligent Driving or Deceased's Employment and Income Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

22 Sep 2016

The appellants, K. J. Mohammad and Smt. Saramma, parents of a deceased 22-year-old son, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, see...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Deceased pedestrian held 50% contributorily negligent for crossing highway without care; insurer's liability reduced proportionately under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

29 Oct 2015

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal heirs of a deceased pedestrian against the owner and insurer of a truck. The accident o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Deceased motorcyclist without helmet and license contributed to accident, reducing insurer's liability under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

27 Apr 2018

The present appeal was filed by the Insurance Company (United India Insurance Company Limited) challenging the judgment and award dated 12th February ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Negligence of Motorcyclist — Deceased Pillion Rider's Death Caused by Rash Driving, Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim on Ground of No Negligence. The court held that in a single-vehicle accident involving a pillion rider, the burden to explain the accident lies on the rider, and failure to do so leads to an inference of negligence against the rider under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

5 Sep 2014

The case pertains to a motor accident claim filed by the legal heirs of Josepha Fernandes @ Josepha Da Silva, who died in a motorcycle accident on 17....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Contributory Negligence from 60% to 50% and Enhances Compensation. The court held that both drivers were equally negligent and enhanced conventional damages following Rajesh v. Rajbir Singh.

25 Jul 2014

The appeal was filed by the claimants, legal representatives of deceased D. Narayanadas, against the judgment and award dated 14th February 2011 passe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of State Transport Driver for Murder and Rampage in Confirmation Case and Appeal. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 381, 427 IPC and Section 3(2) Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act Affirmed; Insanity Defence Rejected.

9 Sep 2014

The Bombay High Court dealt with a confirmation case for death sentence and a criminal appeal arising from the conviction of Santosh Maruti Mane, a dr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Cantonment Board's Pay-and-Park Scheme on MG Road, Pune — Scheme Intra Vires Due to Incidental Powers Under Cantonment Act, 1924. Bye-law 43 and Rule 46 Confer Authority to Regulate Traffic and Levy Parking Fees, Not Violative of Article 19(1)(g).

22 Nov 2005

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged a pay and park scheme introduced by the Pune Cantonment Board on Mahatma ...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)