Search Results for "taxing provision interpretation"

358 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 358 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows NDMC Appeals in Property Tax Dispute — Upholds Unit Area Method as Valid. The impugned Bye-laws are not ultra vires the NDMC Act, 1994, as they fall within the rule-making power under Section 388 and are consistent with Section 63.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) against the Delhi High Court judgment dated August 10, 2017, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Revenue Appeals on Duty Liability for Confiscated Medical Equipment Cleared Under Conditional Exemption Notification No. 64/88-Cus. Court Examines Whether Redemption of Goods is a Pre-Condition for Customs Duty Demand Under Section 125(2) of the Customs Act, 1962.

Background: The case involves two customs appeals before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, filed by the Commissioner of Customs against separate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Order in Service Tax Case — Limitation Bar Not Applicable. The court held that the Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal on limitation grounds when the appeal was filed within the prescribed period under Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994.

The petitioner, M/s. Practice Strategic Communications India Private Limited, a company providing management services, was issued a show cause notice ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Deficit Court Fee Demand in Railway Claims Tribunal Appeal. Fixed Court Fee of Rs.25 Held Applicable Under Article 3 of Schedule II of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959 for Appeals Under Section 23 of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.

The applicants, dependants of deceased Rajanna Linganna Akitwar who died in an untoward incident of falling from a train on 23.04.2012, filed a claim ...