Search Results for "service tax recovery"

1140 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1140 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010217682014_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 179 Order Against Former Director for Tax Dues of Company — No Evidence of Neglect or Misfeasance. Director Who Resigned Before Relevant Assessment Year Cannot Be Held Liable for Company's Tax Default Under Section 179 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Dinesh T. Tailor, was appointed as an Additional director of Yazad Investment & Finance Private Limited on 2 January 1987. He signed a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Venture Capital Fund — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Applicability of Section 10(23FB) Exemption is Invalid.

The petitioner, DHFL Venture Capital Fund, is a trust registered as a venture capital fund under SEBI (Venture Capital Fund) Regulations, 1996. It fil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Division Bench Hears Revenue’s Appeals Against Single Judge’s Order Quashing Section 153C Notices; Weighs Maintainability of Writ Petitions and Natural Justice Concerns.

The present judgment arises from a batch of writ appeals filed by the Revenue against a common order dated 12.08.2022 passed by a Single Judge of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Validity of Retrospective Amendment to Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Amendment Deeming Refining of Oil as Manufacture is Challenged as Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Godrej Soaps Ltd., a public limited company engaged in manufacturing and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Condones Delay in Tax Appeal Filed by Assessee Due to Lack of Notice and Ex-Parte ITAT Order; Litigant Should Not Suffer for Fault of Counsel, Delay of 40 Days Condoned Under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961, on Payment of Costs.

Two Miscellaneous Civil Applications were filed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa by Neelam Ajit Phatarpekar, an assessee, and as legal heir of l...