Search Results for "re-settlement"

490 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 490 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Summary Judgment in Recovery Suit Against DDA for Refund of Sale Consideration After Land Acquisition Lapses. The Court held that DDA cannot retain the money after failing to convey title due to lapsing of acquisition, and the suit was within limitation.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the Delhi High Court's order dismissing the appellant's application for summary judgment under Order XIII...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Notice Under Section 16(2)(a) of Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999. Court directs respondents to issue notice to project affected persons before denying rehabilitation benefits.

The petitioners, legal heirs of a deceased project affected person, filed a writ petition seeking directions to the respondents to issue a notice unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Directs State to Complete Land Acquisition and Pay Compensation After 30-Year Delay -- Systemic Negligence in Land Acquisition Process Addressed in Writ Petition

The petitioners, landowners from Beed district, filed a writ petition after their lands were taken into possession in 1996 for a village tank project,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Constructions in Shirdi — Held That No Notice Under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Is Required Before Demolition of Unauthorized Structures Under Section 52.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by residents of Shirdi challenging the demolition of their structures by the Shirdi Nagar Panchayat. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Awards Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 — Deposit of Compensation in Government Account Not Equivalent to Payment or Deposit in Court.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging land acquisition awards under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The petitioners sought a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Owners' Petition Against Refusal to Register Sale Deeds in MIDC Area. Notification Under Section 1(3) of MIDC Act Does Not Bar Registration of Plots in Layouts Sanctioned Prior to Notification.

The petitioners, land owners, challenged a communication dated 22.1.2015 from the Sub-Registrar refusing to register sale deeds of plots in their layo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Double Acquisition of Land in Land Acquisition Case — Acquisition Proceedings Quashed as Land Already Acquired Once and Partitioned Thereafter. Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Section 4(1) — Double acquisition of same land not permissible.

The petitioners, Devram Govind Gadge and Vitthal Govind Gadge, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition proceedings initiated by the Special ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Enhanced Compensation for Land Acquisition Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 — Petitioners Failed to Demonstrate Entitlement to Higher Compensation as Per Award.

The petitioners, landowners from Uppalkheda, Taluka Soygaon, District Aurangabad, filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of In...