Search Results for "psychotropic substances"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "psychotropic substances"

521 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 521 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42(2) — Secret Information Not Forwarded to Superior Officer. Failure to send a copy of the information recorded under Section 42(1) to the immediate official superior as mandated by Section 42(2) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 renders the search and seizure illegal and the trial vitiated.

5 Mar 2021

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent (accused) by the Special Judge, Pune, for an offence under Section 20(b)(ii)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 — Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate. The mandatory requirement under Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 was not complied with, rendering the search and seizure illegal and the conviction unsustainable.

15 Nov 2006

The appellant, Rama Nagorao Bhagat, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, in Special Case No. 5/2004 for an offence under Section 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 — Search of Bag Without Independent Witnesses and No Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirement. The court held that the mandatory requirement of Section 50 of the NDPS Act was not complied with, and the recovery was doubtful, leading to the grant of bail.

21 Nov 2025

The applicant, Arbaz Aslam Shaikh, filed a bail application under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) in connection wi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Lack of Incriminating Evidence. Court held that non-compliance with Section 52A of NDPS Act and absence of contraband recovery from accused Nos. 4, 5, and 6 entitled them to bail.

4 Mar 2025

The Bombay High Court heard four bail applications arising from the same crime under the NDPS Act. The applicants were accused of involvement in a dru...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance of Section 50 — Search of Bag Not Covered Under Mandatory Procedure. The court held that Section 50 of the NDPS Act applies only to personal search, not to search of a bag, and thus the conviction was set aside.

27 Jun 2019

The appellants, Rehanabi Sheikh Atiq and Sheikh Sohel Sheikh Atiq, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in Special (NDPS) Case 2/20...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in NDPS Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Lack of Independent Witnesses. DRI Officers' Failure to Comply with Mandatory Provisions of NDPS Act, 1985 Renders Seizure Doubtful.

27 Mar 2026

The present appeal was filed by the Intelligence Officer of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) challenging the judgment and order of acquit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Failure to Establish Sample Identity. Conviction under Sections 8, 15, and 31 of NDPS Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Sample Seized Was Same as Tested.

30 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Vijay Pandey against his conviction under Sections 8, 15, and 31 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Prosecution's Failure to Prove Identity. Conviction Overturned as All Contemporary Documents Mentioned Different Name and No Evidence Linked Appellant to Arrested Person Under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(C) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

4 Jan 2024

The Supreme Court considered a criminal appeal arising from the dismissal of a special leave petition, with the appeal surviving only concerning the a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge Application in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Ownership of Land. The court held that where the accused is not the owner or co-owner of the land where contraband is found, no prima facie case under Sections 8, 20, 22, 27 of NDPS Act is made out.

8 Aug 2011

The applicant, Rajendra Sitaram Bhoknal, original accused no.1, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Illegal Detention and Lack of Possession of Premises. Petitioner was kept in illegal custody from 1st May 2019 and the garage from which contraband was recovered was not in his possession, weakening the case under Sections 8, 22, 23, 27A, 28, 29, 32B(a) of NDPS Act.

11 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Shivaraj Urs, accused No.2 in NCB File No.48/1/6/19/BZU, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)