Search Results for "permission denied"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "permission denied"

3118 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3118 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Case: EOU Job Work for DTA Unit Without Export Violates EXIM Policy. The Court held that a 100% EOU cannot undertake job work for a DTA unit and clear finished goods to the DTA without exporting them, and such clearance is not eligible for concessional duty under Notification No.8/97-CE.

6 Mar 2020

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur against the CESTAT order that allowed the appeals of M/s Universal Ferro & A...

High Court

KAHC010062672020_1

16 Mar 2023

This regular second appeal arose from a dispute concerning agricultural land bearing Sy.No.10/1 measuring 2 acres 3 guntas at Kundarasanahalli Village...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Workman to be Represented by Lawyer in Domestic Enquiry When Presenting Officer is Legally Trained and Facts are Complex. The court held that under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act, a workman is entitled to legal representation if the presenting officer is legally trained and the facts are not simple.

25 Feb 2010

The Petitioner, an employee of Respondent No.1 since 1979, was served a charge-sheet on 8th July 2009 for alleged misbehavior and threats to an office...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act in Property Development Dispute. Petitioners Argue Award is Unreasoned and Arbitrator Failed to Independently Analyze Submissions, Seeking Set Aside.

19 Nov 2025

Background: The matter involved a property development dispute concerning three tribal (Adivasi) lands in Malad, Mumbai. The petitioners were legal he...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SRA Termination of Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Developer Failed to Complete Project Within Stipulated Time and Did Not Comply with Development Agreement and SRA Conditions.

12 Apr 2024

The Petitioner, Shailesh Mulchand Savla, sole proprietor of M/s. Kunal Builders & Developers, filed a Writ Petition challenging the termination of his...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Plaintiff to Cross-Examine Hostile Witnesses Called by Defendant in Money Suit — Section 154 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The trial court's order treating DWs 3 and 4 as hostile and permitting the defendant to cross-examine them was set aside as premature and prejudicial to the plaintiff.

16 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Rajiv Vijaysarathy Rathnam, is the plaintiff in a money suit (O.S.No.1305/2013) pending before the XLI Addl. City Civil Judge, Bengalu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines PIL Filed by Environmental Group Against State Bodies and Developer. Challenge Pertains to Approvals for Construction of Hotel in Coastal Regulation Zone at Morjim, Goa.

17 Sep 2019

This Public Interest Litigation filed by two environmental petitioners challenges approvals granted for construction of a hotel/beach resort by respon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 — Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate. The mandatory requirement under Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 was not complied with, rendering the search and seizure illegal and the conviction unsustainable.

15 Nov 2006

The appellant, Rama Nagorao Bhagat, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, in Special Case No. 5/2004 for an offence under Section 20...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Against NAFED in Groundnut Export Dispute — Government Refusal Does Not Excuse Breach Under FOSFA Contract. The court held that a canalizing agency cannot rely on its own lack of permission as a force majeure event under Clause 14 of the FOSFA 20 Contract, and enforcement of the award is not against public policy despite procedural irregularities.

22 Apr 2020

The case involves a dispute between National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED), a canalizing agency for the Government of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits by Counting Prior Service with Board Under Rule 46(2) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 — Resignation to Take Up Another Appointment with Permission Does Not Forfeit Past Service

10 Dec 2013

The Petitioner, Smt. Nagaveni R., filed a writ petition seeking pension and other retiral benefits by counting her service from 25.2.1975 to 5.11.1984...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)