Search Results for "owner's ignorance"

343 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 343 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Municipal Corporation in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Upholds Reference Court's Award of Rs.5 Lakh for Sewerage Treatment Plant Land. Claimants' Restricted Claim Due to Financial Constraints Does Not Bar Higher Compensation if Justified by Potential Value.

The Deputy Director Town Planning of Amravati Municipal Corporation appealed against the judgment of the Reference Court in L.A.C. No.215/2003, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act Restored. Complainant's Evidence Sufficient to Prove Debt and Liability Despite Accused's Defence of Property Dispute.

The appellant, Smt. F. Chandra, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment dated 0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Eviction Suit Between Sisters — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 115 CPC. Ownership of Suit Property Vested in Plaintiff as Title Holder, and Defendants Failed to Prove Benami Transaction or License.

The case involves a dispute between two sisters over a residential property in Mumbai. The plaintiff, Vishala Bokapatna Laxman, filed a suit for evict...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Assault on Public Servant Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 353, 294, 506 IPC and Arms Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ranjitsingh Gulabsingh Chungade, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola in Sessions Trial 234/2002 for offences under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rejects Custom-Based Maintenance Claim in Impartible Estate for Lack of Opinio Necessitatis. Custom Not Proved as Payments Were Voluntary and Not Obligatory, Disallowing Claim for Arrears of Maintenance.

The case concerned a maintenance claim by junior members of the Kavalappara family against the Sthanee of the impartible Kavalappara estate, governed ...