Search Results for "open and peaceful enjoyment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "open and peaceful enjoyment"

212 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 212 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Suit Challenging Deed of Additional Right of Way. Court holds that valuation for jurisdiction is determined by the plaintiff's valuation in the plaint, and the City Civil Court cannot go beyond the plaint allegations to determine pecuniary jurisdiction under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC.

9 Nov 2023

The appeal arises from an order dated 12 October 2022 passed by the City Civil Court, Greater Mumbai, allowing Notice of Motion No. 1797/2021 filed by...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Lok Adalat Compromise Decree in Partition Suit: Third Party Not Permitted to Invoke Article 226 Against Lok Adalat Award. Writ Remedy Not Available to Strangers to Decree; Proper Recourse Is to File a Separate Suit for Declaration and Partition.

15 Dec 2025

The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by five individuals claiming to be members of the same family as t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Revision Against Summoning Order in Cheque Dishonour Case — Dispute Over Partnership Firm's Authority to File Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that a complaint under Section 138 must be filed by an authorized person, and partners are not automatically liable.

16 Sep 2025

The applicants, Romell Housing LLP and Jude Romell, filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court challenging the summoning order...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. The court held that no substantial question of law arises for consideration in second appeals challenging concurrent findings of fact in a suit for possession.

24 Nov 2015

The judgment pertains to two Regular Second Appeals (RSA No.7512/2010 and RSA No.7511/2010) filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 19...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Under Article 227 Against Rejection of Application Under Section 151 CPC for Appointment of Commissioner in Suit for Specific Performance. Inherent Powers Under Section 151 CPC Can Be Invoked for Appointment of Commissioner to Ascertain Physical Features of Property, Even if Not Covered Under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC.

1 Jul 2022

The petitioners, who are defendants in a suit for specific performance of contract (O.S. No. 445/2011) pending before the Principal Senior Civil Judge...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where courts below have concurrently found that plaintiffs failed to prove title and possession.

15 Dec 2016

The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of certain immovable property. The trial court d...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

6 Aug 2020

The appellant, Sri Shivashankar, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Civil Suit Over Ex Parte Decree and Demolition Order, Remands for Fresh Adjudication. The court held that a defendant appealing under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, without filing an application under Order IX Rule 13, can challenge the ex parte decree on grounds of improper service of summons or illegality of ex parte proceedings based on the suit record, as per Section 105.

6 Sep 2022

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by the first respondent-plaintiff in the City Civil Court at Bangalore, seeking a declaration of ownership o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Section 14 SARFAESI Act Order for Police Aid — No Locus Standi for Borrower's Partner After Property Sold to Third Party. The Court held that once the secured asset is sold and possession handed over to the auction purchaser, the borrower or its partner has no right to challenge the Section 14 order, and the remedy lies before the DRT under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.

9 Oct 2015

The petitioners, M/s. National Laminate Corporation (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Jayantilal L. Nisar, filed a writ petition under Article ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Karnataka High Court Order Setting Aside Rejection of Plaint in Res Judicata Case. The Court held that the subsequent suit for declaration of title was barred by res judicata and Order II Rule 2 CPC as the issue of title had been finally decided in earlier litigation.

8 Dec 2021

The dispute pertains to 11 acres 16 guntas of agricultural land in Talaghattapura Village, Bangalore. The appellants (Lankappa and others) claimed tit...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)