Search Results for "office copy admissibility"

296 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 296 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rajratan Sahebrao Nawghare, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nanded, in Special Case (POCSO) No.10/2013 for offences under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in NDPS Case Based on Confessional Statements and Recovery of Charas. Statements under Section 67 of NDPS Act, 1985 held admissible and voluntary, and recovery of contraband from house and auto rickshaw established guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The Supreme Court of India heard two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Gujarat High Court, which had affirmed the conviction of S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Duty Drawback Interest Case, Upholding High Court's Award of Interest for Delayed Refund. Clarificatory Circulars Under Exim Policy Have Retrospective Effect, Making Contractor Eligible for Duty Drawback and Interest Under Sections 27A and 75A of Customs Act, 1962.

The dispute arose from the respondent's claim for duty drawback under the deemed export scheme for civil construction work in the Koyna Hydro Electric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Scrutiny Committee's Rejection of Halba Scheduled Tribe Claim. Court Holds That Documentary Evidence from 1923 Prevails Over Anthropological Texts, and Halba and Halbi Are the Same Tribe Under Entry 19 of the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950.

The petitioner, Sanjay s/o Rama Nandanwar, challenged the order dated 31 July 2013 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amrav...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Family Property Dispute — No Arbitration Agreement Exists Between Parties. Will Clause Cannot Substitute Arbitration Agreement Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Mrs. Padmini Chandran Menon, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Amendment in Suit for Specific Performance to Include Alternative Relief of Refund of Advance Amount. Amendment Sought Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC and Section 22 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 Held Permissible as It Does Not Change Nature of Suit.

The petitioner, M/s. Samrudhi Groups, a registered partnership firm, filed a suit for specific performance of contract (O.S.No.281/2017) against the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree in Landlord-Tenant Dispute — Tenancy Validly Terminated Under Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Relationship of landlord and tenant established through lease agreement and rent receipts, and notice of termination held valid.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit for eviction and possession filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by lega...