Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree in Landlord-Tenant Dispute — Tenancy Validly Terminated Under Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Relationship of landlord and tenant established through lease agreement and rent receipts, and notice of termination held valid.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 268
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit for eviction and possession filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by legal representatives) against the defendant-tenant. The suit property was leased to the defendant No.1 on 16-4-1984. The plaintiff issued a notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 terminating the tenancy and claiming arrears of rent of Rs.810/- for the period from 15-7-1985 to 14-4-1986. The Trial Court dismissed the suit on 23-7-1993, holding that the tenancy was not proved. The plaintiff appealed to the District Court, which allowed the appeal on 7-11-2001, setting aside the Trial Court's judgment and decreeing eviction and possession along with arrears of rent and an enquiry into mesne profits under Order XX Rule 10(1) CPC. The original defendant No.2 (appellant) filed the present second appeal. The High Court framed substantial questions of law regarding the validity of the lease agreement and the termination notice. The Court examined the evidence and found that the lower Appellate Court had correctly appreciated the evidence, including the lease agreement and rent receipts, establishing the landlord-tenant relationship. The notice of termination was also held valid. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the second appeal, upholding the eviction decree.

Headnote

A) Property Law - Landlord and Tenant - Eviction - Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - The suit for eviction was based on a notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The Trial Court dismissed the suit holding that the tenancy was not proved. The lower Appellate Court reversed the finding and decreed eviction. The High Court upheld the Appellate Court's decision, holding that the relationship of landlord and tenant was established through the lease agreement and rent receipts, and the notice of termination was valid. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the lower Appellate Court was justified in reversing the Trial Court's finding that the tenancy was not proved and in decreeing eviction and possession.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Second Appeal dismissed. The judgment and decree passed by the lower Appellate Court are confirmed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act
  • 1882
  • Notice of termination of tenancy
  • Lease agreement
  • Relationship of landlord and tenant
  • Eviction decree
  • Mesne profits
  • Order XX Rule 10(1) CPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (06) 108

Second Appeal No.24 of 2002

2016-06-16

R.K. Deshpande, J.

Shri V.V. Bhangde for Appellant, Shri H.S. Chitaley for Respondent Nos.1 to 6

Ganesh s/o Ramkisan Bairagi

Parwatabai wd/o Tukaram Appa Landge and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Second appeal against decree of eviction and possession in a landlord-tenant dispute.

Remedy Sought

Appellant (original defendant No.2) sought to set aside the eviction decree passed by the lower Appellate Court.

Filing Reason

The appellant challenged the lower Appellate Court's finding that the tenancy was validly terminated and that the plaintiff was entitled to eviction.

Previous Decisions

Trial Court dismissed the suit on 23-7-1993; lower Appellate Court allowed appeal on 7-11-2001 decreeing eviction.

Issues

Whether the document styled as agreement of lease was valid and established the relationship of landlord and tenant? Whether the notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 validly terminated the tenancy?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the tenancy was not proved and the notice was invalid. Respondents argued that the lease agreement and rent receipts proved the tenancy and the notice was valid.

Ratio Decidendi

The relationship of landlord and tenant is established by the lease agreement and rent receipts, and the notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 validly terminates the tenancy, entitling the landlord to eviction and possession.

Judgment Excerpts

The Trial Court recorded a finding that the tenancy between the plaintiff and the defendant No.1 in respect of the suit property created on 16-4-1984 has not been proved by the plaintiff... The lower Appellate Court has reversed this finding and it is held that the plaintiff has established the relationship of 'Landlord and Tenant' between him and the defendant No.1...

Procedural History

Regular Civil Suit No.63 of 1986 filed for eviction and possession; dismissed by Trial Court on 23-7-1993; Regular Civil Appeal No.172 of 1993 allowed by Joint District Judge, Amravati on 7-11-2001 decreeing eviction; present Second Appeal No.24 of 2002 filed by original defendant No.2.

Acts & Sections

  • Transfer of Property Act, 1882: 106
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC): Order XX Rule 10(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree in Landlord-Tenant Dispute — Tenancy Validly Terminated Under Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Relationship of landlord and tenant established through lease agreement and rent receipts, and no...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer Not Liable for Death of Employee Who Died of Heart Attack While on Leave. The court held that the death did not arise out of and in the course of employment under Section 3 o...