Search Results for "media person definition"

260 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 260 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Application of Accused in UAPA Case on Grounds of Parity and Merits. Parity with co-accused granted bail is not a valid ground when the applicant's role is distinct and the first bail application was rejected on merits.

The applicant, Dr. Gokarakonda Naga Saibaba, filed a second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Application for Clarification in AMIE Degree Equivalence Case. Institution of Mechanical Engineers (India) Cannot Claim Its Associate Membership Certificate as Equivalent to a Degree in Engineering Without UGC or AICTE Approval.

The case pertains to a Miscellaneous Application filed by the Institution of Mechanical Engineers (India) in a disposed Civil Appeal. The appellant, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Batch of Writ Appeals Filed Under Karnataka High Court Act Against Single Judge Order in BDA Matter. The Court’s decision and specific legal findings are not provided in the extracted text.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, constituted by Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice N.S. Sanjay Gowda, heard a batch of writ appeals on 26th ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes IDBI Bank's Wilful Defaulter Declaration Against Non-Executive Director. The Court Holds that Failure to Provide Copies of Documents and Fair Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice and RBI Guidelines.

Background: The writ petition was filed by a non-executive director of Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, a public listed company, challenging his declara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...