Search Results for "inconsistent testimony"

1703 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1703 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The present criminal appeals were preferred by the appellants-accused under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Extra-Judicial Confession and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Reversed as High Court Erred in Reappreciating Evidence Without Compelling Reasons Under Principles Governing Appeals Against Acquittal.

The dispute arose from the death of a 2.5-year-old child in Hubli, Karnataka, on 03.11.2002. The appellant, the younger brother of the child's father ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Brother Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove motive, last seen theory, and recovery of weapon beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shyam Vishnu Yadav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad on 06.01.2017 for the murder of his brother Namdeo under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 4 of POCSO Act and Section 376 IPC set aside as medical evidence did not support rape and prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sunil Sable, was convicted by the Special Judge under POCSO Act, Dhule, for offences under Section 4 of the POCSO Act and Sections 376(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 4, 5(m) and (n) read with Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shaikh Anees, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO Act), Aurangabad, for offences under Sections 4, 5(m) and (n) read with Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 324, 449 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Laxman Babulal Rajput, Prakash Babulal Rajput, and Harisingh Babulal Rajput, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Sexual Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 377 IPC and Section 8(2) of Goa Children's Act, 2003 set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Rukmuddin Kudminchi, was convicted by the Children's Court for the State of Goa in Special Case No.52/2011 for offences under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Lack of Conclusive Circumstantial Evidence and Flawed Investigation. Conviction under Sections 302 and 392 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Did Not Form Complete Chain Pointing to Guilt.

The appellant, Snehal Dias, was convicted by the Special Judge, NDPS, Mapusa, for the murder of Naresh Dourado and robbery of his car and other items,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 307 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Jaipal S/o Bhimrao Meshram and Subhash S/o Maroti Safekar, were convicted by the 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara in Sess...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Drug-Laced Biscuit Theft Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 328 and 379 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Administration of Poisonous Substance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ramu s/o Vijay Mandal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nandurbar, in Sessions Case No. 13 of 2008 for offences under Se...