Search Results for "fraudulent signatures"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "fraudulent signatures"

247 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 247 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Pay Fixation Dispute — No Misrepresentation by Employee. Recovery of Rs.3,46,931/- from pension set aside as order passed without notice and employee not responsible for pay fixation error.

4 Aug 2021

The petitioner, Rangrao s/o Mersing Jadhav, was appointed as a Peon on 08.11.1983 and superannuated on 31.08.2017 as Junior Administrative Officer (Su...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Caste Scrutiny Committee's Invalidation of OBC Claim — Petitioner Disqualified as Councillor. Court upholds committee's order based on vigilance report and lack of valid documents, finding no perversity warranting interference under Article 226.

21 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Jagdish Revansiddha Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging three orders: (1) the orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Co-operative Society Recovery Proceedings — Petitioner Failed to Exhaust Statutory Remedy of Appeal Under Section 154 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not ordinarily exercisable when an alternative statutory remedy is available and no exceptional circumstances exist.

7 Mar 2018

The petitioner, Manisha Bijal Shah, filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging recovery proceedings initiated...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order Refusing to Reopen Evidence in Partition Suit. Court holds that Order 18 Rule 17 CPC cannot be used to fill gaps in evidence or to re-examine witnesses on matters already covered, and that the trial court's discretion in refusing to reopen evidence was not perverse or arbitrary.

19 Nov 2015

The petitioners, who are plaintiffs in a partition suit (O.S. No. 100/2007) pending before the Principal Civil Judge, Bangalore Rural District, filed ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears First Appeals Against Dismissal of Partition Suit. Multiple Appellants Challenge Judgment in O.S. No. 1949/1980 Dismissing Suit for Partition and Separate Possession.

1 Mar 2013

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Interim Injunction in Property Dispute — Status Quo Vacated and Injunction Granted to Protect Possession Pending Suit. The court upheld the trial court's finding that the respondents had a prima facie case and balance of convenience in their favor, and that the appellants failed to show any perversity or illegality in the impugned order.

23 Oct 2013

The case involves two appeals from order challenging a common order dated 11 February 2013 passed by the trial court in Special Civil Suit No. 577 of ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Examines Writ Petition Challenging Conduct of Elections to Karnataka Medical Council. Preliminary Objections Based on Estoppel and Availability of Alternative Remedy Raised Under Karnataka Medical Registration Act, 1961.

7 Jun 2021

The petitioner, a registered member of the Karnataka Medical Council, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Legal Heirs to Continue Winding-Up Proceedings as Representatives of Deceased Contributory in Company Liquidation. The court held that under Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013, legal heirs can represent the estate of a deceased contributory without formal substitution under CPC Order 22 Rule 3.

29 Jan 2025

The judgment pertains to a series of company applications filed in the winding-up proceedings of M/s. Maxworth Orchards (India) Ltd. The original appl...

High Court

Bombay High Court pronounces judgment on Letters Patent appeals in oppression and mismanagement case under Companies Act, 1956 — dispute over diversion of Contship agency business. The Court examined whether directors' diversion of business opportunity amounted to oppression and breach of fiduciary duty under Sections 397, 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 and Section 88 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882.

31 Mar 2006

The appeals arose from a dispute between the Puri Group and the Sippy Group, both holding equal shares and equal directorships in two private Indian s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against 37 Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Element. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to a criminal application filed by 37 accused persons seeking quashing of FIR No. 86/2016 registered at Police Station Pimpalgao...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)