Search Results for "customs officers"

831 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 831 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty for FEMA Violations in Bogus Export Case — Appellant Director Held Liable for Receiving Remittances Without Actual Exports Under Sections 3(b) and 3(d) of FEMA.

The case involves an appeal under Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) against an order of the Appellate Tribunal for Foreig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION Nos. 452

Multiple writ petitions and a criminal application were filed before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging police actions of raiding or sto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Import Restriction for Areca Nuts — Condition Requiring NOC from FSSAI Held Ultra Vires. Import Policy Condition Violates Article 19(1)(g) and Article 14 of Constitution as It Lacks Statutory Authority and Is Disproportionate.

The petitioner, Siddhi Vinayak, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1913, engaged in the import of areca nuts (commonly kn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Legality of Entry Tax on Goods Imported from Abroad; State Legislations of Orissa, Bihar, Kerala and Jharkhand Under Scrutiny

Background: The case involves a batch of civil appeals before the Supreme Court concerning the levy of entry tax on goods imported from foreign countr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Heirs' Challenge to Gold Seizure and Penalty Under Gold (Control) Act, 1968 — Upholds Tribunal's Finding of Possession of Primary Gold Without Permit. Burden of Proof on Possessor Not Discharged; Penalty of Rs. 5,000 Upheld as Within Statutory Limits.

The petitioners, heirs of late Ramratan Shrivallabh Chandak, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28th February 1986 passed by the Customs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. The court held that failure to consider the detenu's retraction of confession and non-supply of the retraction letter violated Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Anju Madan Lalwani, wife of Madan Vishindas Lalwani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the deten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Execution. Delay of 14 Months in Serving Detention Order Renders Subjective Satisfaction Stale and Detention Invalid Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, father of the detenu, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a detention order dated 2/8/2008...