Search Results for "arrest memo"

669 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 669 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in NDPS Case for Possession of 3 kg Heroin — Ten Years' RI and Fine of Rs. 1 Lakh Maintained. Search of Bag Not Personal Search, Hence Section 50 NDPS Act Not Applicable.

The appellant, Vinod Ramchandra Dhakad, was convicted by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Mumbai, in NDPS Special Case No. 107/2004 for an offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in NDPS Act Case for Smuggling Heroin in Suitcases. Circumstantial Evidence Including Possession of Keys, Baggage Tags, and Concealment of Contraband Sufficient to Prove Conscious Possession Under Section 21(c) of NDPS Act, 1985.

The appellant, Mrs. Agnes Ruddy Odhoch, a Kenyan national, was convicted by the Special Judge, Greater Mumbai, for offences under Sections 21(c), 23(c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Gang Rape Case — Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Corroboration Lead to Upholding of Acquittal Under Section 376(2)(g) IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of five respondents (original accused) by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, in Sessions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition No. 3410 of 2004

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard two writ petitions together. The petitioners, former Branch Manager and Accountant of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction in Unlawful Activities Case — Appellant Convicted for Criminal Conspiracy and Unlawful Activities. The Court upheld the conviction under Section 120B IPC and Sections 10(a)(i), 10(a)(iv), 38(1) of UAP Act, finding no perversity in concurrent findings.

The appellant was arraigned as an accused in FIR Crime No. 1 of 2015 registered at Q Branch Police Station, Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu, for offences p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as sole reliance on chance witness identification without corroboration was unsafe.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by three appellants (original accused nos. 1, 2, and 5) against their conviction under Section 302 read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Radheshyam Dashrath Naitam, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-4, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No.433/2015 for the murder of Ma...