Search Results for "additional security deposit"

1161 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1161 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010255032014_1

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru considered two criminal appeals: Criminal Appeal No. 539 of 2014 filed by the accused under Section 374(2) of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Revocation of Multi-System Operator Registrations for Non-Compliance with Rule 11(7) of the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994. The Court found that the denial of security clearance was not communicated and no opportunity of hearing was afforded.

SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd. and Digi Cable Network (India) Pvt. Ltd., along with Digi Navi Mumbai Network Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions under Artic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.1543 OF 2014

The matter arose from a stock trading dispute between Keynote Capitals Ltd. (a trading member of the National Stock Exchange) and Eco Recycling Ltd. (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Tender Award in Public Works Contract. Court holds that once a tender is accepted and performance security deposited, the contract is concluded and cannot be unilaterally cancelled without valid reasons.

The petitioner, M/s. Tirupati Construction, a proprietorship firm, participated in an e-tender issued by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Reduces Interest Rate from 12% to 9% in Contractor's Recovery Suit Against State. The court held that interest under Section 34 CPC must be reasonable and not excessive, reducing the rate to 9% per annum.

The dispute arose out of a contract awarded by the State of Goa to P.B. Ibrahim, a Class I PWD Contractor, for improvement of riding quality of NH-4A ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Interest Rate Reduced from 18% to 9%. The court held that the arbitrator's award did not violate public policy but reduced the interest rate as excessive under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Union of India, challenged an arbitral award dated 8 October 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The ...