Search Results for "Tribunal Award Modified"

1878 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1878 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Company's Appeal Against Industrial Tribunal Award – Modifies Gratuity Scheme and Applies Calcutta Medical Scheme; Bonus Remanded. Dispute Over Medical Benefits and Gratuity for Workmen in Madras Region Resolved by Applying Established Principles from Prior Decisions.

The case originated from an industrial dispute between Remington Rand of India Limited and its workmen in the Madras region over demands for revision ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Parents of Deceased MBA Student, Enhances Compensation from Rs. 2 Lakh to Rs. 23.38 Lakh in Motor Accident Claim. Notional Income of Rs. 15,000 Per Month Adopted with 40% Future Prospects and Multiplier of 18.

The appellants, parents of the deceased Sujeet Singh, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Insurance Appeals Challenging Tribunal Awards on Multiplier and Future Prospects; Decision Not Provided in Excerpt.

The Bombay High Court heard three first appeals filed by insurance companies challenging awards passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunals. In First Ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals in Motor Accident Claims Challenging Tribunal's Absolution of Insurer and Inadequate Compensation. Claimants Argue That Insurer Failed to Prove Driving Licence Breach and Must Pay Under 'Pay and Recover' Principle of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeals arose from a motor vehicle accident on 30.06.2009 where a husband and wife on a motorcycle were hit by a rashly driven Light Goods Vehicle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Dismissing Complaint for Non-Implementation of Award. Delay of 4½ years in filing complaint under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 held fatal as no sufficient cause shown.

The petitioner, Kashinath Parvati Labade, was a workman employed with the Department of Social Forestry, Maharashtra. He was allegedly illegally termi...