Search Results for "Transferable Development Right"

276 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 276 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Commercial Construction. Court upholds MCGM's action under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 for building without valid permission and in violation of development plan reservations.

The petitioners, Kamla Industrial Park Ltd and Metallica Industries Ltd, challenged the demolition notice and stop-work notice issued by the Municipal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CIDCO's Tender Cancellation as Arbitrary and Unreasonable. Petitioner's Highest Bid Accepted After 21 Months, Cancellation Without Justification Violates Article 14.

The petitioner, Bhagwati Akshar Empire LLP, participated in an e-auction conducted by the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Transfer of Zilla Parishad Teachers to State Government — Transfer Policy Upheld as Administrative Decision Not Requiring Prior Consultation with Teachers' Unions.

The petitioners, various teachers' unions and associations, filed writ petitions challenging the transfer of Zilla Parishad primary school teachers to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Appeals by Aggregators and Bike Taxi Owners Against State’s Refusal to Grant Permits for Bike Taxi Services. Dispute Centers on Whether Motorcycle Owners Are Entitled to Render Bike Taxi Services Under the Motor Vehicles Act and Karnataka Rules.

The case comprised five writ appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging a common order dated 02.04.2025 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Rejection in Consortium Bid — Bid Rejection Upheld as Consortium Agreement Did Not Designate Petitioner as Prime Member

The petitioner, M/s. Bee Jay Contractors, a registered partnership firm, formed a consortium with M/s. Brij Gopal Construction Company to bid for a te...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Society Members Against Unauthorized Construction and Demolition by Developer. Members have locus standi to challenge illegal construction; administrator must act lawfully.

The petitioners, who are members of the Linking Road Housing Society Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the unauthorized construction and demo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Amendment in Suit for Specific Performance to Include Alternative Relief of Refund of Advance Amount. Amendment Sought Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC and Section 22 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 Held Permissible as It Does Not Change Nature of Suit.

The petitioner, M/s. Samrudhi Groups, a registered partnership firm, filed a suit for specific performance of contract (O.S.No.281/2017) against the r...