Search Results for "Trade Well"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Trade Well"

3262 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3262 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Classification of Electrical Insulated Press Board Under Third Schedule of KVAT Act, 2003. Assessee's Claim for Lower Tax Rate as 'Paper' is Examined Under Common Parlance and Trade Parlance Tests.

20 Aug 2014

The assessee, a registered dealer under the CST Act and KVAT Act, manufactured and sold Electrical Insulated Press Board (High Density Board) used in ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Sales Tax Assessment Orders Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Petitioners Failed to Show Exceptional Circumstances to Bypass Statutory Remedy of Reference Under Section 61(1) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

20 Jan 2015

The petitioners, Tata Sons Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court chal...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeals by BBMP and Health Officer Regarding Delegation of Quasi-Judicial Power to Cancel Trade Licences under Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. The Health Officer's cancellation of restaurant trade licences for hookah service was quashed as ultra vires, the Commissioner's authority being quasi-judicial and not delegable under Section 66.

27 Feb 2013

The Bruhath Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) and its Health Officer filed writ appeals against a single judge's order that quashed the Health Office...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Accept Opposition to Trademark Registration Due to Delay. Section 21 of Trade Marks Act, 1999 Prescribes Mandatory Limitation Period of Three Months Plus One Month Extension, and Registrar Has No Power to Entertain Opposition Filed Beyond That Period.

27 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Sardar Gurudas Singh Bedi, trading as Volga Confectionary Works, sought to oppose the registration of the trademark 'Volga Ice Cream' ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Anti-Dumping Duty Recommendation on Flexible Slabstock Polyol from Saudi Arabia and UAE — Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Failure to Consider Relevant Material. The Designated Authority's final findings dated 01.09.2020 were set aside for non-consideration of the petitioners' submissions and reliance on unsubstantiated data, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.

6 Jan 2021

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the final findings dated 01.09.2020 of the D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cancellation of Trademark 'PAXIL' for Non-Use Under Section 47 of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Petitioner's Global Reputation and Prior Use Established 'Person Aggrieved' Status.

24 Apr 2026

The Petitioner, Glaxo Group Limited, a global pharmaceutical company, filed a petition under Section 47 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 seeking cancellat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Regional Labour Commissioner's Order Declaring Office Bearers of Unrecognized Union as Protected Workmen Under Section 33(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Only Office Bearers of Recognized Union (Federation) Are Entitled to Protected Workmen Status; Deemed Recognition on Expiry of 15 Days Not Contemplated Under Rule 61(4) of Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957.

12 Nov 2024

The Petitioner, Tata Communications Limited, challenged an order dated 14 August 2024 passed by the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Pune, decl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sun Pharma's Trademark Infringement Suit Against Sanofi's METOSAN, Finding No Deceptive Similarity with METOSARTAN. The marks are phonetically and visually distinct, and the products differ in composition, negating likelihood of confusion.

24 Oct 2016

The plaintiff, Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against The Madras Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi Indi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Appeal Against Discretionary Order Refusing Interim Injunction in Passing Off Suit — Visual Wrapper Similarity and Ordinary Purchaser Test Examined. Court Examines Whether Emphasis on Dissimilarities Rather Than Similarities Amounted to Error of Principle.

28 Sep 2021

The present appeal arose from a suit for passing off and copyright infringement filed by ITC Limited (plaintiff) against CG Foods (India) Private Limi...

High Court

Madras High Court Adjudicates Trademark Opposition Over 'Big Bite' Mark in Class 30. Court Considers Application of Prior User Test and Relevance of Trans-Border Reputation Under Trademarks Act, 1999.

11 Feb 2026

The appeals were filed under Section 91 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 against a common order dated 18.7.2014 by the Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks. The...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)