Search Results for "Section 395 IPC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Section 395 IPC"

237 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 237 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disposes Transfer Petition in Criminal Case Arising from Jat Agitation, Declining Transfer but Emphasizing State's Duty and Fair Prosecution. Court Held Transfer Not Warranted Due to Passage of Time and Witness Examination, but Allowed Petitioners to Approach Director of Prosecution and Seek Witness Protection Under Witness Protection Scheme 2018.

30 Jan 2023

The Supreme Court disposed of a transfer petition filed by petitioners seeking to move a criminal case from Haryana to Delhi. The case arose from the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Death Reference and Appeals Arising from 2000 Church Bomb Blast Case. Accused Allegedly part of Deendar Anjuman, charged with conspiracy under IPC Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A.

17 Dec 2014

On December 17, 2014, the High Court of Karnataka delivered a common judgment in Criminal RC No. 3/2008, Criminal Appeal No. 1203/2008, and Criminal A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused No.6 Under MCOC Act for Organized Crime, Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal of Other Accused. Court holds that conviction under Section 3(1)(i) and 3(4) of MCOC Act requires proof of organized crime syndicate and unlawful activity, and acquittal of other accused does not affect conviction of one accused if evidence is sufficient.

17 Jan 2014

The judgment pertains to two connected criminal appeals arising from MCOC Special Case No. 3 of 2002. Criminal Appeal No. 97 of 2005 was filed by Arpa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Mandamus to Register FIR in Economic Offences Case — No Mandatory Duty to Register FIR on Private Complaint Without Preliminary Inquiry. Court Holds That Police Have Discretion to Conduct Preliminary Inquiry Before Registering FIR Under Section 154 CrPC, and Writ of Mandamus Cannot Be Issued to Compel Registration.

26 Nov 2010

The petitioner, Mrs. Charu Kishor Mehta, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to c...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in DJ Halli Riot Case — Cites Parity and Length of Incarceration. Appellant entitled to bail under Section 14-A of SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989 as co-accused already released and trial not likely to conclude soon.

22 Jun 2021

The judgment concerns two criminal appeals filed under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against High Court's Refusal of Leave to Appeal in Acquittal Case. High Court Erred by Applying Wrong Test Under Section 378(3) Cr.P.C. and Ignoring Medical Evidence of Fracture.

31 Jan 2019

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the High Court's order dated 13.06.2008 rejecting its application for leave to appeal against the acquittal ...

High Court

KAHC010366622012_1

21 Jun 2016

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction Overturned as Prosecution Failed to Establish Complete Chain of Circumstances and Comply with Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 in Recovery of Deceased's Body.

12 Jan 2023

The appeal arose from a murder case where the appellant, Boby (accused No. 3), was convicted by the trial court and High Court for offences including ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Verification of In-Camera Statements. Failure to Verify Secret Statements Renders Subjective Satisfaction Invalid, Making Detention Order Unsustainable.

3 Mar 2016

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Dipak alias D. Baba Kashinath Kamble, challenged a detention order dated 7 August 2015 issued by the Commissione...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Bail Not Considered. Failure to consider pending bail applications and absence of credible material linking detenu to public order disturbance renders detention order invalid under Section 3 of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Dangerous Persons and Video Pirates Act, 1981.

11 Dec 2019

The petitioner, Govindsing Papulsing Tak, challenged a preventive detention order dated 22 February 2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune Ci...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)