Search Results for "Section 30(1)"

680 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 680 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petitions in VAT Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Orders Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 39(1) of KVAT Act, 2003. Mandatory Pre-Decision Hearing Requirement Not Waived Despite Assessee's Participation in Subsequent Proceedings.

The judgment concerns five revision petitions filed under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) against orders of the Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes VAT Assessment Order for FY 2013-14 Against Luxembourg-Based Companies Due to Gross Violation of Natural Justice and Backdating of Order. Assessment order found to be pre-dated and based on no notice or hearing, rendering it null and void.

The petitioners, comprising two Luxembourg-based companies (Petitioners 1 and 2) and their Indian group company (Petitioner 3), challenged an assessme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Challenging Disqualification of DCC Bank Director Under Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959. Disqualification for Default in Loan Repayment Upheld as Per Section 29C(1)(b) of the Act.

The appellant, Sri R.M. Manjunath Gowda, was a director and president of the Shimogga District Central Co-operative Bank (DCC Bank). He had taken a lo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Commercial Summary Suit Cases — Triable Issues Raised on Guarantee and Limitation. Court holds that existence of disputed facts regarding limitation and discharge of guarantor requires unconditional leave to defend under Order XXXVII CPC.

The judgment arises from two commercial appeals filed by the defendants against the dismissal of their applications for leave to defend in commercial ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Seeking to Unilaterally Implement Notice of Change Under Section 9A of Industrial Disputes Act. Employer Cannot Implement Proposed Changes Without Settlement or Award from Competent Court.

The petitioner, J. D. Orgochem Limited (formerly Jaysynth Dyechem Ltd.), is a company engaged in manufacturing chemicals. The respondent, Dyes and Che...