PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.66 OF 2003
21 Nov 2006The public interest litigation was filed by a journalist challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtra under Section 37 of the Maharashtra Regi...
Search Results for "Safeguard Duty"
1176 result(s) found
Found 1176 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Adjudicates Challenge to Declaration of Chandrapur as Dry District Under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. Order Dated 05.03.2015 and Section 139(1)(a) of the Act Challenged as Violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.
7 Jan 2016This batch of writ petitions challenged the declaration of Chandrapur as a dry district. The petitioners, holders of licenses under the Maharashtra Pr...
- 22
High Court
- 35
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Public Interest Litigation for Rejuvenation of Godavari River Due to Extensive Pollution — Directs Implementation of NEERI Recommendations and Preventive Measures. Pollution of Godavari River by untreated sewage, industrial effluents, and religious activities violates public trust doctrine and Article 51A(g); preventive steps ordered under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 and Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
18 Dec 2018This public interest litigation was filed by citizens of Nashik seeking directions to clean and prevent pollution of river Godavari, the second longes...
- 52
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.
3 Dec 2015The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...
- 30
High Court
Karnataka High Court Examines Legality of Arrests by Enforcement Directorate in Money Laundering Case After Predicate Offence Closed. Petitioners Allege Violation of Section 19 of PMLA and Fundamental Rights, Challenging Custody Remand Orders.
16 Jun 2026The three writ petitions, heard together, challenged the legality of the arrest and subsequent custody remand orders of the petitioners, who were dire...
- 41
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Proceedings. The Court upheld the validity of the NIA's takeover of investigation and the sanction order under Section 45(2) UAPA, finding that the timeline for independent review is directory and the cognizance order was based on prima facie material.
20 Sep 2024The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...
- 684
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices and Order in Cenvat Credit Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Recovery of Central Excise Duty for Periods 2007-2008 Barred by Limitation as Notices Issued After Unreasonable Delay of Over 13 Years.
5 Aug 2022The Petitioner, Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging five show cause notices issued between 20...
- 29
High Court
Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Against Public Servant Under Prevention of Corruption Act Due to Defective Source Report. Source Information Report Prepared in Hot Haste Without Calculating Disproportionate Assets, Violates Fundamental Rights.
26 Jul 2022The petitioner, a public servant working as an Executive Engineer in Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited, was accused of amassing assets ...
- 39
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Compromise Decrees Passed Without Appointment of Representatives Under U.P. Court of Wards Act. Section 56 of the U.P. Court of Wards Act, 1912, Held to be Directory and Not Mandatory, Validating the Compromise Decrees.
14 Dec 1959The dispute arose from two cross-suits between the appellant, proprietor of Ganeshpur Estate, and the respondent, proprietor of Ramnagar Estate, conce...
- 53
