Search Results for "Rule 330"

376 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 376 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Awards Compensation to Victims of Meerut Fire Tragedy Due to State and Organizer Negligence. State and Organizers Held Jointly and Severally Liable for Deaths and Injuries from Fire at Victoria Park Exhibition Due to Failure to Obtain Permissions and Ensure Fire Safety.

The Supreme Court dealt with a writ petition filed by victims of a fire tragedy that occurred on April 10, 2006, at Victoria Park, Meerut, during the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Recall Order in Hawala Income Tax Case. Tribunal's power to recall its ex parte order under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is upheld as procedural rectification.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax-12, Mumbai (Revenue) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Defendant Guilty of Contempt for Willful Disobedience of Injunction in Copyright and Passing Off Case. Defendant's Continued Use of Deceptively Similar Trade Dress Despite Court Order Constitutes Contempt Under Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC.

The Plaintiff, Cargil India Private Limited, a subsidiary of Cargil Inc., is engaged in the business of edible oils and holds copyright in the packagi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Dismissal of Appeal in Default in Consumer Dispute Regarding Defective School Bus. The court restored the appeal to the State Commission for hearing on merits, holding that dismissal in default does not bar a writ petition.

The petitioners, a company and its director, challenged an order dated 12-10-2017 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Nagpur C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Over Reinstatement for Daily Wage Employee in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Refusal of reinstatement and back wages upheld as employee worked only for 4 years and compensation of Rs. 25,000 deemed adequate under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Jagdish s/o Karuji Bombarde, was a daily wage employee of the Municipal Council, Tumsar. He was appointed in February 1997, transferre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Impleadment of Subsequent Purchasers in Partition Appeal. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC allows joinder of parties whose presence is necessary for effective adjudication, even if purchase is during pendency of litigation under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs in a partition suit, filed Regular Civil Suit No.268/2008 seeking half share in suit lands bearing Gat No.151 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Rejection of Application to Reopen Evidence in Civil Suit. Trial Court's Discretion Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC Upheld as Defendants Had Sufficient Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witness.

The petitioners, who were the original defendants in Special Civil Suit No.74/2010 pending before the Second Joint Civil Judge, Satara, filed four wri...