Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 5 TADA for Possession of Weapon. Appellant Challenges Recovery Evidence and Disclosure Statement in Bombay Blast Case.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Rule 273"
631 result(s) found
Found 631 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Rejecting Condonation of Delay in Customs and Central Excise Appeals; Directs Fresh Consideration. Appellate Authorities Failed to Exclude Time Taken in Prosecuting Writ Petitions Before Filing Statutory Appeals, as Required Under Section 14(2) of Limitation Act, 1963.
24 Dec 2014The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court. The lead petition, WP N...
- 20
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Public Interest Litigation Concerning Recruitment and Selection Process. Petition Challenges Appointments Made by State Authorities Alleging Irregularities in Selection.
21 Jun 2016The judgment text provided is incomplete, containing only the case heading, date, court, judges, advocates, and a list of parties. The matter is a wri...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Against Partial Arbitral Awards in Koyna Hydro Electric Project Sub-Contract Dispute. Challenge to awards failing on grounds of settlement and coercion under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
8 Jan 2016The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. (th...
- 21
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Second Appeal in Land Dispute Case Due to Non-Compliance with Conditional Order. Court holds that failure to pay costs as directed by the court results in dismissal of the appeal under Section 100 CPC.
19 Dec 2025The State of Karnataka and its officers filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment...
- 112
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Consideration of OTS Scheme Under RBI Guidelines in SARFAESI Act Matter. Court holds that once possession of secured asset is taken under Section 13(4) of SARFAESI Act, 2002, the remedy lies before the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17, not by way of writ petition.
5 Dec 2016The petitioners, Dr. Kishor Chimasaheb Nimbalkar and Sou. Dhanshree Kishor Nimbalkar, are running a hospital. They obtained a home loan of Rs.34,00,00...
- 132
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955 in Assam Accord Challenge — Majority Holds Cut-off Date of 25.03.1971 for Regularisation of Immigrants Valid. The court held that the provision is a reasonable classification under Article 14 and does not violate Articles 6, 7, 29, 325, 326, 355, 356, or 368 of the Constitution.
17 Mar 2025The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions and appeals, considered the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which was i...
- 880
High Court
High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 88 of Finance Act, 2004. Petitioner, a tyre manufacturer, contended that the cut-off date of 1 April 2000 for utilization of Additional Excise Duty credit is arbitrary and violates Article 14.
23 Dec 2014The petitioners, CEAT Limited, engaged in the manufacture of tyres, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...
- 22
High Court
High Court Acquits Sub-Registrar in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.
4 Sep 2023The appellant, Mohan Bhaiyyalal Shrivastava, was a Sub-Registrar at Barshitakli, Akola. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Akola in Special Case N...
- 27
High Court
High Court Dismisses Appeal by Unsuccessful Bidder in Tender Matter — No Arbitrariness Found in Rejection of Bid for Non-Compliance with Tender Conditions. The court upheld the rejection of the bid for failure to submit a mandatory consent letter, affirming the limited scope of judicial review in tender matters.
15 Nov 2018The appellant, Mahindra Sanyo Special Steel Private Limited, an unsuccessful bidder, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of its bid in Ten...
- 117
