Search Results for "Notice under Section 32(2)"

401 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 401 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted; failure to show loan in income tax returns does not invalidate legally enforceable debt.

The appellant, Pushpa Sanchalal Kothari, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the acquitt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against Quashing of Second FIR in Corruption Case — Second FIR Permissible When It Discloses Distinct and Separate Incidents Not Part of Same Transaction.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Rajasthan against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court quashing the second FIR register...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Resolves Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for 'Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout'. The Petitioners Sought to Quash Preliminary Notification Dated 21.05.2008 and Final Notification Dated 18.02.2010 Issued by Bangalore Development Authority.

A large batch of writ petitions came before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Challenging Eviction for Nuisance Under Bombay Rent Act. Concurrent Findings of Fact on Nuisance Under Section 13(1)(c) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 Upheld.

The petitioner, original defendant Suklal Kalu Thorat (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), filed a writ petition challenging the judgment dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiffs' Suit for License Fee and Compensation, Allows Defendant's Counter-Claim for Losses Due to Suppression of No Development Zone Status. Plaintiffs held liable for fraudulent misrepresentation regarding land use, entitling Defendant to damages for demolished tower.

The plaintiffs, owners of a larger property in Madh, Malad, Mumbai, entered into a leave and license agreement with the defendant, a telecom company, ...