Search Results for "Mumbai head office"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Mumbai head office"

2134 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2134 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Transfer of ITAT Appeals from Bangalore to Mumbai Bench for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. President of ITAT Cannot Delegate Power to Transfer Cases to a Bench; Speaking Order by Bangalore Bench Exceeded Authority Under Section 255(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

21 May 2021

The petitioner, MSPL Limited, challenged two orders: (1) a speaking order dated 19.03.2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bangalo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Order for Reinstatement of Workmen in Industrial Dispute — Employer's Failure to Prove Abandonment of Service and Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Renders Termination Illegal. The court held that the burden to prove abandonment lies on the employer and that termination without notice or compensation under Section 25F is void.

20 Dec 2013

The judgment arises from two writ petitions: Writ Petition No.248 of 2011 filed by Kamala Mills Limited challenging the order of the 1st Labour Court,...

High Court

High Court of Judicature of Bombay at Aurangabad Bench Disposes of Batch of Writ Petitions Against Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee. The Petitions Involved Challenges to Verification Proceedings of Scheduled Tribe Claims Under Maharashtra Act.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Revocation of Multi-System Operator Registrations for Non-Compliance with Rule 11(7) of the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994. The Court found that the denial of security clearance was not communicated and no opportunity of hearing was afforded.

30 Oct 2015

SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd. and Digi Cable Network (India) Pvt. Ltd., along with Digi Navi Mumbai Network Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions under Artic...

High Court

(1) WRIT PETITION NO.4168 OF 2012

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Application for Appointment of Receiver in Partition Suit. Notice of Motion Seeks Interim Relief for Joint Family Properties Allegedly Misappropriated by Co-Owners.

27 Aug 2013

The plaintiff filed a suit for declaration that he is entitled to a 1/10th share in the assets and properties of the joint family and for partition by...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.5134 OF 2018

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Teacher's Challenge to Promotion of Another Teacher as Headmaster in MEPS Act Case — Seniority and Qualifications Not Decisive Where Management's Discretion Upheld. The court held that the School Tribunal's findings were based on evidence and not perverse, and that the management's discretion in promotion cannot be interfered with under writ jurisdiction.

28 Jul 2016

The petitioner, Smt. Pushpanjali Subodha Shenvi, was appointed as an assistant teacher in Ganesh Vidya Mandir, a private aided secondary school run by...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses PILs and Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Vice-Chancellor Under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994. Court Holds That UGC Regulations 2010 Not Adopted by University, and Search Committee and Chancellor’s Decision Not Vitiated by Illegality or Mala Fides.

9 Aug 2011

The litigation arose out of three petitions—two public interest litigations and one writ petition—challenging the appointment of Dr. Rajan Welukar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Workmen in Unfair Labour Practice Case. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that keeping workmen as temporaries for years constituted an unfair labour practice under Items 6 and 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

16 Mar 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by Century Rayon (a division of Century Textiles & Industries Ltd.) challenging an order of the Industr...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)