Search Results for "Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976"

409 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 409 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court on Restrictive Covenants in Redevelopment

The Bombay High Court considered three interim applications arising from a suit between two cooperative housing societies concerni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Resolves Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for 'Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout'. The Petitioners Sought to Quash Preliminary Notification Dated 21.05.2008 and Final Notification Dated 18.02.2010 Issued by Bangalore Development Authority.

A large batch of writ petitions came before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Application in Development Agreement Dispute — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out as Agreement Was Terminated for Non-Performance. Specific Performance Claim Requires Trial; No Irreparable Loss Shown.

The Plaintiffs, Shantilal J. Shah and others, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a Development Agreement dated 25th September 2007 and an Irrevoc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Property Tax Levy by Panvel Municipal Corporation on Kharghar Node. Petitioners Lacked Locus Standi and Failed to Exhaust Statutory Remedy of Appeal Under Section 406 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

The petitioners, Kharghar Co-op. Housing Societies Federation and an individual resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC020009812016_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Premium Paid Under ULC Act Government Resolution — Petitioner Cannot Claim Refund After Voluntarily Availing Benefit and Selling Land to Third Parties.

The petitioner, Sudarshan Chemical Industries Ltd., was a beneficiary of an exemption order dated 29 February 1980 under Section 20(1) of the Urban La...