Search Results for "Legal necessity"

3468 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3468 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Charity Commissioner's Order Allowing Intervention in Trust's Section 36 Application. Right to be Heard Under Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1951 Limited to Persons with Direct Interest in Trust Property.

The petitioner, Shree Khambhati Modh Vanik Samaj, is a public charitable trust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950. It owns a prop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit by Minor Children Seeking to Set Aside Family Settlement — Memorandum of Family Settlement Held Binding as a Family Arrangement Under Contract Act and Specific Relief Act

The plaintiffs, four children of Madhupati and Anuradha Singhania (Defendants 1 and 2), filed a suit seeking cancellation of a Memorandum of Family Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Examines Constitutional Validity of Ordinance Extending Term of Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti Office Bearers. Petitioners Contend That Ordinance Promulgated Under Article 213 for Assembly Elections Lacks Emergent Circumstances and Infringes Constitutional Mandates.

These writ petitions were filed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against Bombay High Court Judgment Upholding Sanction of Competing Slum Scheme; Appeal Ongoing.

The dispute centered on a 2,005 sq. mts. parcel in Malad, Mumbai, originally declared a slum in 1987 under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Cl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Restrains Interference and Construction Pending Suit. Prima facie case established regarding joint family property and partnership firm rights under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The appellants, Mr. Parth Ghorpade and Mr. Sarvajeet Ghorpade, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) read with Section 151 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Income Tax Search and Seizure Action Under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Court Holds That Formation of Reason to Believe by the Authorizing Officer Is Based on Material on Record and Not Open to Challenge Unless Malafide or No Material Exists.

The petitioners, a private limited company and its directors and their relatives, challenged the search and seizure action conducted on 9th and 10th J...