KAHC010085932008_1
10 Aug 2018...
Search Results for "Implied Repeal"
210 result(s) found
Found 210 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Competent Authority's Orders Under MOFA, 1963 — Orders Quashed for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. The Competent Authority under Section 5A of MOFA, 1963 cannot adjudicate title or possession of land, and must follow principles of natural justice.
18 Apr 2024The judgment involves two writ petitions: Writ Petition No. 180 of 2018 filed by Marathon Era Co-operative Housing Society Ltd and Writ Petition No. 2...
- 91
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Challenge to BDA Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary Notification Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Final Notification Under BDA Act, 1976.
11 Jul 2014This batch of writ petitions was filed by various land owners under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging land acquisition not...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds — Section 34 Application Filed Beyond Limitation Period. Court holds that period of limitation for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 runs from the date of receipt of the original award and is not extended by a subsequent correction application under Section 33.
7 Jan 2014The petitioner, Marwadi Shares & Finance Ltd, a member of the National Stock Exchange and Bombay Stock Exchange, had disputes with its constituent, re...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Transfer of Writ Petitions and Contempt Petition from Aurangabad Bench to Principal Seat Under Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules, 1960. Legality of Chief Justice's Administrative Transfer Orders and Validity of Proviso to Rule 2 of Chapter XXXI Raised.
11 Dec 2014The Bombay High Court heard three writ petitions filed by the Lawyers' Forum for General Utility & Litigating Public, Aurangabad, challenging the admi...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Union's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Recognized Union Not Required for Item 6 Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act. Unrecognized Union Can Maintain Complaint Under Item 6 of Schedule IV of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.
6 Jul 2010The petitioner, Maharashtra Lok Kamgar Sanghatana, an unrecognized trade union registered under the Trade Union Act, 1926, filed a writ petition under...
- 49
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Bail Rejection and Clarifies Limits of Bail Jurisdiction — High Court Cannot Issue Directions Beyond Bail Consideration. Court holds that while dismissing bail, the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by directing the Trial Court to issue summons under Sections 62 and 69 CrPC and take coercive measures against those delaying proceedings.
1 Jan 2026The appellant, Rambalak, was an accused in Case Crime No.175/2002 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Police ...
- 127
High Court
Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.
18 Jun 2024The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...
- 366
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Probate Petition for Will Executed by NRI in Ecuador. Will executed abroad by Non-Resident Indian held valid under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925, and probate granted to executor in Mumbai.
16 Oct 2025The petitioner, Sarwan Kumar Jhabarmal Choudhary, filed a testamentary petition (L) No. 6300 of 2024 in the Bombay High Court seeking probate of the L...
- 91
