Search Results for "Illegal gratification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Illegal gratification"

456 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 456 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Government Servant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Based on Reliable Trap Evidence. Constable's Conviction for Demanding and Accepting Bribe from Liquor Trader Sustained as Witness Testimonies Were Consistent and Defence Claims Unsubstantiated Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

13 Mar 2026

The Supreme Court of India heard a criminal appeal against the High Court of Uttarakhand's judgment dated 13.04.2012, which upheld the Trial Court's c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction and Unreliable Evidence. Failure to Obtain Valid Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Renders Trial Void, and Trap Witness Testimony Found Unreliable to Prove Demand and Acceptance of Bribe.

1 Dec 2025

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti-Corruption Bureau, Pune, filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 2nd September 2008 passed by ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Acquittal of Commercial Tax Officer and Inspector under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 upheld due to lack of credible evidence and discrepancies in trap proceedings.

9 Apr 2025

The State of Karnataka, through the Lokayukta Police, Chikkaballapur District, filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Code of Criminal Pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand. Variance in Witness Testimony on Demand of Bribe Not Material, but Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

18 Apr 2023

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Baburao Tayappa Mhetre (Respondent No.1) and Elahee Badshah Shaikh (Respondent No.2) by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Former Home Minister in PMLA Case — Twin Conditions Under Section 45 Not Satisfied. Applicant held entitled to bail as ED failed to demonstrate reasonable grounds for believing applicant guilty of money laundering under PMLA.

4 Oct 2022

The applicant, Anil Vasantrao Deshmukh, a former Home Minister of Maharashtra, filed a bail application under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

24 Nov 2020

The appellant, Dattatraya Jagannathrao Zombade, was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad, for offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Criminal Misconduct. Conviction under Section 5(2) read with Section 5(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 set aside as prosecution failed to prove abuse of official position or pecuniary advantage.

1 Oct 2014

The appellant, Waman Somaji Burde, was the District Deputy Registrar (Cooperative Societies) in Nagpur from 1 July 1985 to 13 May 1987. He was prosecu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Police Constable Accused in Corruption Case — Special Judge's Order Rejecting Discharge Quashed for Failure to Consider Defence Documents. Court Remits Matter for Fresh Consideration of Discharge Application Under Section 227 CrPC, Holding That Unimpeachable Defence Documents Can Be Considered at Charge Stage.

2 Nov 2012

The petitioner, Arif Ali s/o Yusuf Ali Sayyed, a police constable, was the original accused in Special Case No. 19 of 2011 before the learned Special ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

16 Jul 2012

The appellant, Wamanrao Pawar, a Head Constable, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati in Special Case No. 3 of 1989 for offences u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as complainant's testimony was found untrustworthy and independent witnesses turned hostile.

21 Sep 2006

The appellant, Sarfrazkhan Umdardaax Khan, was a police officer (ASI) convicted by the Special Judge, Amravati, in Special Case No.12 of 1989 for offe...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)