Search Results for "Finance Act 1950"

284 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 284 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Advisory Board Opinion in COFEPOSA Detention Case — Advisory Board's Opinion of No Sufficient Cause for Detention is Non-Justiciable and Not Subject to Challenge Under Article 136

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India against the opinion of the Advisory Board constituted under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Second Appeals in RERA Delayed Possession Matter. Builder Challenges Appellate Tribunal's Direction to Pay Interest at 10.05% p.a. from February 2014.

These Second Appeals were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay by Runwal Constructions, a registered partnership firm, challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.5186 OF 2001

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Attachment Order Passed by Executing Court in Execution Case Involving Gratuity Amount. Gratuity Payable Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Held Exempt from Attachment Under Section 13 Even After Death of Employee.

The present writ petition was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 03.06.2021 passed by the Principal Civi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Chamber Summons Filed by Defendant for Return of Plaint in Suit for Damages Under Lease Agreement. Application Seeks Transfer to Chennai Court Citing Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause; Court Also Considers Limitation and Cause of Action.

The matter pertained to a chamber summons filed by the defendant in a suit for damages. The defendant, Integrated Finance Co. Ltd., sought return of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Reserves Verdict on Stay of Film ‘Black Friday’ Amid Pending Trial in 1993 Blasts Case. Accused Argues Docudrama Constitutes Contempt and Defamation, Violates Right to Fair Trial Under Article 21.

The writ petition was filed by Mushtaq Moosa Tarani, accused No. 44 in the 1993 Bombay bomb blasts trial (Bombay Blast Case No. 1 of 1993), under the ...