Search Results for "Excluded Child"

316 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 316 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to DNA Evidence Inconsistency and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f)(l) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act set aside as DNA report excluded semen and blood of accused, and victim's testimony was tutored.

The appellant, Bhaiyya S/o Vijay Chakre, was convicted by the Special Judge, Achalpur, for offences under Section 376(2)(f)(l) of the Indian Penal Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Exclusion of Unaided Private School Students from National Means cum Merit Scholarship Scheme. Classification Between Government/Aided/Local Body Schools and Unaided Private Schools Held Reasonable and Not Violative of Article 14.

The petitioner, Sri Sri Ravishankar Vidya Mandir, a recognized unaided private school in Osmanabad, challenged the validity of Note I of clause 3(d) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 427, 435, 452 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Sections 302, 427, 435, 452 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellants were...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age of Victim. Birth Certificate with overwriting and lack of ossification test render age of victim unproven, vitiating conviction under Sections 376(2)(i),(n) IPC, Goa Children's Act, and POCSO Act.

The appellant, Santosh Gore, was convicted by the Children's Court for the State of Goa in Special Case No.36/2017 for offences under Section 376(2)(i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Over Counter-Claim in Partnership Dispute. Allegations of fraud in counter-claim do not render it non-arbitrable unless serious and complex, under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves two arbitration petitions filed by Rekha Agarwal and Sunil Agarwal challenging an order of a Sole Arbitrator under Section 16 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Life Convict Seeking Premature Release — State's Order Requiring 26 Years Imprisonment Set Aside. Court holds that Government Resolution dated 15th March 2010 requires specific finding of exceptional violence to deny premature release after 14 years.

The petitioner, Santosh @ Sonu Balram Jadhav, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment on 21st July...