Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

1601 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1601 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Online Liquor Delivery Platform in Excise License Dispute. The court held that the petitioner's order processing and delivery services do not amount to 'sale' under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965, and quashed the Excise Commissioner's letter demanding a license.

The petitioner, Hip Bar Pvt. Ltd., is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, offering a semi-closed prepaid payment instrument (mobile ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 88 of Finance Act, 2004. Petitioner, a tyre manufacturer, contended that the cut-off date of 1 April 2000 for utilization of Additional Excise Duty credit is arbitrary and violates Article 14.

The petitioners, CEAT Limited, engaged in the manufacture of tyres, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging CBEC Circular on Brand Rate of Drawback. Court holds that an exporter can claim Brand Rate of drawback under Rule 7 of the Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback Rules, 1995 even after availing All Industry Rate under Rule 3.

The petitioner, Alfa Laval (India) Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a Circular dated 30th Decemb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Central Excise Registration Without Notice. Petitioner's Registration Cancelled for Shifting Premises Without Fresh Registration, But Court Held That Natural Justice Requires Prior Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Cancellation.

The petitioner, M/s Borochemie (India) Pvt. Ltd., was engaged in import and sale of goods like Borax Pentahydrate. It obtained Central Excise registra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Arrest Under PML Act — Validity of Arrest Under Section 19 PML Act Must Be Examined by Trial Court at Remand Stage

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by Arvind Kejriwal challenging his arrest by the Directorate of Enforcement (DoE) under Section 19 of the Prevention...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Pre-Deposit Condition in Central Excise Remand Order — Condition of Rs.40 Lakhs Deposit Set Aside as Unwarranted. CESTAT Cannot Impose Pre-Deposit Condition While Remanding Matter for De Novo Adjudication Under Central Excise Act, 1944.

The appellant, M/s Dhariwal Industries Limited, a manufacturer of Panmasala and Gutka registered under the Central Excise Act, 1944, was issued a show...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses BCCI's Appeals in Service Tax Dispute Over IPL Media Rights — Holds That Services to Foreign Entities Are Not Exported Services Under Export of Services Rules, 2005.

The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) filed four appeals against a common order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (...